Live data from Hacker News

Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo

blog.mozilla.org

501–510 of 970 posts

Re: Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo

#501

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fines aren't a way to just buy your way out of obeying the law. At some point if they persist in monopolistic activities then they will get broken up.

I don't think the FTC prioritizes that right now

I don't think they've prioritized that ever in recent memory, or they would have already been broken up a long time ago.

Re: Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo

#502
post #357

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They also have the "extensions that can do real ad blocking" angle.

chromium-ungoogled works perfectly fine with "extensions that can do real ad blocking" ;)

Ungoogled Chromium is maintaining Manifest V2 support in the fork?

Re: Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo

#503
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The track record of MBA's destroying companies says otherwise. What Mozilla needs is a change in leadership direction, not another MBA.

I very much doubt that the track record of companies fronted by an hands-on engineer is much better. If anything they probably fail faster on average so we never hear about them.

Most of the big tech companies were started and led by technical people.

Re: Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo

#504

Having worked at Mozilla a while ago, the CEO role is one I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy. Success is oddly defined: it's a non-profit (well, a for-profit owned by a non-profit) that needs to make a big profit in a short amount of time. And anything done to make that profit will annoy the community. I hope Anthony leans into what makes Mozilla special. The past few years, Mozilla's business model has been to just m…

The job was always very easy, fire all of the pure managers and sock the google money into an endowment before it runs out. Then focus on privacy as you mentioned. They’ve taken in several billion dollars by now. Let that sink in. They're supposedly a non-profit, so this plan is the well-trodden playbook. But of course no Manager instance could imagine such a thing. Cue Upton Sinclair quote.

>sock the google money into an endowment before it runs out.

They did that! Why are people proposing that like it's a new idea?

Re: Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo

#505
post #253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you're not going to get it until your OS decides to, and if its implementation is poor you're SOL?

Choose the implementation that you like, or contribute to help make one better. Just like all other software on your computer. Don't like Libreoffice's implementation of Word support? Install Koffice. I take it you've never installed non-OEM software on your computer?

Why would anyone install Koffice when clearly they would wait for the OS to support Word directly?

Re: Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo

#506

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firefox has ads in the same places. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/sponsor-privacy

whataboutism gets you nowhere. Brave is still adware.

As is Firefox, and Chrome.

So really, there's no point in singling it out.

Re: Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo

#507
post #301

"Mozilla's former CEO, Mitchell Baker, earned nearly $7 million in 2022, with compensation rising from around $3 million in 2020 to over $5.5 million in 2021 and $6.9 million in 2022" I wonder how much the new CEO is making now.

Just to clarify how outrageous the Mozilla CEO compensation is, consider that Tim Cook makes 0.019% of Apple's revenue in compensation ($75M on $391BN of revenue). For Sundar Pichai (Google), it's 0.003%; Samsung is 0.0001%; Nadella at Microsoft is 0.032%. For Mozilla? 1.18%! That's almost FORTY TIMES these other companies. Apple revolutionized mobile computing; Google revolutionized search, Microsoft owns enterprise…

I wonder what the percentage would be if you were to remove the $500M yearly check by Google.

Re: Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo

#508

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How many engineers are enough to make a browser? How do you know? Vivaldi employ 28 developers and 33 others to make an unstable Chromium fork and email program.[1] Bloat and bullshit features to you are minimum requirements to someone else. [1] https://vivaldi.com/team/

There are about 800 unique weekly committers to the Chromium project, so that's a start at gauging the number for that project. A little harder to find that same figure for Firefox, but Wikipedia says Mozilla Corp had about 750 employees as of 2020. Anyway, if you have $50M, you can afford 500 people at $100k, or 250 people at $200k. So you simply declare, this is how many people it takes to make a browser, and set y…

You're significantly underestimating fully-loaded cost per person + other expenses. An engineer making a $200k salary is going to cost the company something like $300k, and there are some additional fixed overheads. And $200k is quite a bit less than your competitors are paying.

So you're looking at something more like 150 employees total of which <100 are going to be pure engineers, and that's stretching your budget and operations pretty aggressively while also fighting an uphill battle for recruiting skilled and experienced engineers. (And browser development definitely needs a core of experienced engineers with a relatively niche set of skills!)

Re: Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo

#510

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firefox has ads in the same places. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/sponsor-privacy

whataboutism gets you nowhere. Brave is still adware.

It might be adware but I’ve actually never noticed the ads!

Also it’s the only browser on my phone that I can use to browse the web without ads…

Post reply on HN