Live data from Hacker News

Meta Ray-Ban Display

meta.com

501–510 of 993 posts

Re: Meta Ray-Ban Display

#501
post #60

The live demo of this is brutal. https://x.com/ns123abc/status/1968469616545452055

Typical Meta product. I used to believe and wasted money on multiple generations of Quest & Ray-bans. I expect this device to be unsupported at launch, just like Quest Pro was

The portal was like their best product and they just abandoned it.

Re: Meta Ray-Ban Display

#502
post #63

I refuse to buy hardware from Meta again. I bought two Portal TV from them and it discontinued and not supported within two years. Now I have two junks in my drawer. :(

cries in Oculus Go :( > released on May 1, 2018 to generally positive reviews. By July 2019, the Go was estimated to have sold over two million units. On June 23, 2020, Facebook Technologies announced it would be ending the sales of the Oculus Go later that year

https://developers.meta.com/horizon/blog/unlocking-oculus-go...

Re: Meta Ray-Ban Display

#504

I'm getting Macworld 2007 vibes

I am getting Phillips CDI vibes. It takes me back to a mid 90s infomercial where products will built by marketing departments and companies with cash to splash. There is just no bottom up cool factor. At all. reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhZdWvnF3do

What's this 30 minute ad?! Who was the intended audience!

Re: Meta Ray-Ban Display

#505
post #236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Meta has close to 4 billion people worldwide using one or more of their products. Their brand problem doesn't extend much further than the HN comment section.

In my (totally limited) experience, most non-tech people don’t even know what Meta is. WhatsApp is almost the only messaging platform used where I live (and pretty much everywhere outside the US). I remember doing Bug Bounty for Meta a while ago and telling some friends and family about it, and I had to repeatedly explain they _are_ Facebook and WhatsApp and Instagram and many other things because they would look at…

[deleted]

Re: Meta Ray-Ban Display

#506
post #348

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm never going to update a photo government ID to some company just to use an app. What kind of a bonkers world are we living in? Totally ridiculous. No app is worth this.

Most new accounts seem to require a face scan too (finally they're true to their name?). I recently needed to get a Facebook account and was not able to use it without providing the scan. Luckily I was able to do an AI face swap, but far from everyone is that savvy.

Interesting. Did you swap your face on a computer, and pointed the smartphone camera on the monitor?

Re: Meta Ray-Ban Display

#507
post #236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Meta has close to 4 billion people worldwide using one or more of their products. Their brand problem doesn't extend much further than the HN comment section.

> Meta has close to 4 billion people worldwide using one or more of their products. If you ask any of those 4 billion people if they know WhatsApp is related in anyway to Meta, your answers will be split between "no" and "what's a Meta?"

People in HN treat non tech people as illiterate. Everyone knows what meta and facebook is and who owns whatsapp. At least if you remove the >50 years old folks.

Most non tech folks believes that Meta listens to their conversation for ads in Instagram, but that's a different issue, and even with that belief they are fine with that. I have seen this discussion so many times with so many different groups.

Re: Meta Ray-Ban Display

#508

>Meta Ray-Ban Display glasses are designed to help you look up and stay present. With a quick glance at the in-lens display, you can accomplish everyday tasks—like checking messages, previewing photos, and collaborating with visual Meta AI prompts Can you imagine trying to talk to someone face to face, but they are giving you a blank stare as random notifications and tiktok videos are being beamed inbetween their eye…

Every sufficiently tech obsessed kids dream about being able to look at the screen while walking. It takes experiencting for them to accept it doesn't work.

Re: Meta Ray-Ban Display

#509
post #287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All babies look the same, out of anything private you could film by mistake, a baby seems pretty harmless.

Face recognition is uninuitively good. Google Photos was able to pick out faces from my baby photos pretty easily.

Google Photos works in a near perfect extremely constrained closed system: your photos have fewer than a hundred faces, it likely biases uncertainties with more confidence due to those constraints.

Re: Meta Ray-Ban Display

#510

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Almost everyone I know who got a quest stopped using it after a week. It's a fun toy, but gets boring pretty quickly.

I use mine for flight simming. The screen looks great for the price, and lets me stream games like DCS World from my desktop. Far as fun toys go, the Quest sits head-and-shoulders over my Nintendo Switch.

For me too, I use mine for hours every week
Post reply on HN