Live data from Hacker News

The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

positiveblue.substack.com

501–510 of 520 posts

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#501
post #379
post #363

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can always stop bots. Add login/password. But people want their content to be accessible to as large audience as possible, but at the same time they don't want that data to be accessible to the same audience via other channels. logic. Bots are not consuming your data - humans are. At the end of the day humans will eventually read it and take actions. For example chatgpt will mention your site, the user will visit…

> And no, nothing was different before 2022. Just look at google, the largest bot scraping network in the world. Since 1996. I'm sorry, but this statement shows you have no recent experience with these crawlernets. Google, from the beginning, has done their best to work with server owners. They respect robots.txt. I think they were the first to implement Crawl-Delay. They crawl based on how often things change anyway…

Did you send any abuse reports to the ASNs for those IP addresses?

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#502

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you don't want AI bots reading information on the web, you don't actually want a free and open web. This is such a bad faith argument. We want a town center for the whole community to enjoy! What, you don't like those people shooting up drugs over there? But they're enjoying it too, this is what you wanted right? They're not harming you by doing their drugs. Everyone is enjoying it!

Clearly you don't want the whole community to enjoy it then. Openness is incompatible with keeping the riff raff out

It isn't incompatible at all. You might also be shocked to learn that all you can eat buffets will kick you out if you grab all the food and dump it on your table.

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#503

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How so? If you don't want AI bots reading information on the web, you don't actually want a free and open web. The reality of an open web is that such information is free and available for anyone.

> information is free and available for anyone. Bots aren't people. You can want public water fountains without wanting a company attaching a hose to the base to siphon municipal water for corporate use, rendering them unusable for everyone else. You can want free libraries without companies using their employees' library cards to systematically check out all the books at all times so they don't need to wait if they…

> Bots aren't people.

I am though and I get blocked by these bot checks all the time.

Buddha, what makes us human?

That's simple, running up to date Chrome on with javascript enabled does.

I want to be able to enjoy water fountains and libraries without having to show my ID. Somehow we are able to police those via other means, so let's not shit up the web with draconian measures either.

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#504

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is it available for everyone if the AI bots bring down your server?

Ultimately, you have to realize that this is a losing battle, unless we have completely draconian control over every piece of silicon. Captchas are being defeated; at this point they're basically just mechanisms to prove you Really Want to Make That Request to the extent that you'll spend some compute time on it, which is starting to become a bit of a waste of electricity and carbon. Talented people that want to scra…

Agreed, copyright issues need to be solved via legislation and network abuse issues need to be solved by network operators. Trying to run around either only makes the web worse for everyone.

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#505

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What we need is some legal teeth behind robots.txt. It won't stop everyone, but Big Corp would be a tasty target for lawsuits.

It wouldn’t stop anyone. The bots you want to block already operate out of places where those laws wouldn’t be enforced.

If that was the case then I am I getting buttflare-blocked here in the EU.

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#506
post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What we need is some legal teeth behind robots.txt. It won't stop everyone, but Big Corp would be a tasty target for lawsuits.

The funny thing about the good old WWW is the first two W's stand for world-wide. So Which legal teeth?

Try hosting some illegal-in-the-US content and find out.

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#507
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“But the reality is how can someone small protect their blog or content from AI training bots?” Why would you need to? If your inability to assemble basic HTML forces you to adopt enormous, bloated frameworks that require two full cores of a cpu to render your post… … or if you think your online missives are a step in the road to content creator riches … … then I suppose I see the problem. Otherwise there’s no proble…

I have had to disable at least one service because AI bots kept hitting it and it started impacting other stuff I was running that I am more interested in. Part of it was the CPU load on the database rendering dozens of 404s per second (which still required a database call), part of it was that the thumbnail images were being queried over and over again with seemingly different parameters for no reason. I'm sure ther…

> Part of it was the CPU load on the database rendering dozens of 404s per second (which still required a database call)

That's one request every 80 ms which is an eternity in CPU time. How the hell can you not afford to check that something doesn't exist every 80 ms.

> part of it was that the thumbnail images were being queried over and over again with seemingly different parameters for no reason.

Is there a reason you are serving thumbnails for arbitrary parameters?

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#508
post #198
post #20

Everyone loves the dream of a free for all and open web. But the reality is how can someone small protect their blog or content from AI training bots? E.g.: They just blindly trust someone is sending Agent vs Training bots and super duper respecting robots.txt? Get real... Or, fine what if they do respect robots.txt, but they buy the data that may or may not have been shielded through liability layers via "licensed d…

"I want an open web!" "Okay, that means AI companies can train on your content." "Well, actually, we need some protections..." "So you want a closed web with access controls?" "No no no, I support openness! Can't we just have, like, ethical openness? Where everyone respects boundaries but there's no enforcement mechanism? Why are you making this so black and white?"

"I want a free an open society!"

"But criminals are people too."

See how stupid that sounds?

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#509
post #20

Everyone loves the dream of a free for all and open web. But the reality is how can someone small protect their blog or content from AI training bots? E.g.: They just blindly trust someone is sending Agent vs Training bots and super duper respecting robots.txt? Get real... Or, fine what if they do respect robots.txt, but they buy the data that may or may not have been shielded through liability layers via "licensed d…

The problem's cause really is about _who_ has to pay for the traffic, and currently that's the hosting end. If you turn that model around, suddenly AI web scrapers have to behave and all the issues that we currently have are kind of solved(?), because there is no incentive to scrape datasets anymore that were put together by others, and there automatically will be a payment incentive instead to buy high-quality datas…

But I don't want to make human users of my website pay for the traffic just like I also donate to real world charities that I believe in.

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#510
post #156
post #20

Everyone loves the dream of a free for all and open web. But the reality is how can someone small protect their blog or content from AI training bots? E.g.: They just blindly trust someone is sending Agent vs Training bots and super duper respecting robots.txt? Get real... Or, fine what if they do respect robots.txt, but they buy the data that may or may not have been shielded through liability layers via "licensed d…

nonsense. I'm routinely denied access to websites now. enable javascript and unblock cookies to continue

Javascript and cookies are far from enough, your browser also needs to look like a recent mainstream one without niche privacy extensions.
Post reply on HN