Earlier quoted context omitted.
The premise of that proposal is that the test scores are inaccurate as a result of the economic disparity, because people with less income have less resources to prepare for the test. That would apply in the case of an economic disparity because having more resources allows you to artificially receive a higher score. It's not about accepting someone with less merit out of charity but rather about adjusting for a meas…
> But the economic disparity is the reason for the racial disparity, because otherwise we expect people of different races are equally intelligent, right? So the economic disparity is the real one and accounting for that inherently accounts for the racial disparity as well, and you don't need both. That's only true if you assume prejudices like racism and sexism don't exist anymore, but they do. Even today, these are…
These are test scores. They're graded by people -- if not machines -- that don't know the race of the person taking the test. Anyone of any race can get a better score in one way: By getting more of the answers right.