Live data from Hacker News

Reddit Threatens to Remove Moderators from Subreddits Continuing Blackouts

macrumors.com

501–510 of 614 posts

Re: Reddit Threatens to Remove Moderators from Subreddits Continuing Blackouts

#501
post #61
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mastodon is more of a Twitter replacement, no?

Indeed. It can however interact with Lemmy and kbin, which are direct Reddit replacements.

All three use federated groups:

https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/groups-implementation/...

There are groups on Mastodon that you can join and follow.

Re: Reddit Threatens to Remove Moderators from Subreddits Continuing Blackouts

#502
post #18

Thing is, I am much more loyal to the mods of my favorite subs, then I'm to reddit. And my guess is, that is the case with a lot of the power users.

9 out of 10 days most Reddit mods are considered the scum of the earth, it's a literal meme at this point how bad a lot of them are. They are the heroes this week because it fits their narrative. Censorship, power-tripping, running subs with a iron fist, etc Nobody knows or cares who they are. As much as they'd like to think they are, the mods are not the community. The community is the people. The people are not the…

It is scorched Earth mixed with an incredible sense of political and emotional bias. Shame really. Not moderate in either sense of the word.

Re: Reddit Threatens to Remove Moderators from Subreddits Continuing Blackouts

#503

Earlier quoted context omitted.

9 out of 10 days most Reddit mods are considered the scum of the earth, it's a literal meme at this point how bad a lot of them are. They are the heroes this week because it fits their narrative. Censorship, power-tripping, running subs with a iron fist, etc Nobody knows or cares who they are. As much as they'd like to think they are, the mods are not the community. The community is the people. The people are not the…

Sounds like you may need to find some different subs to participate in. Majority of experiences with mods in mine have been between very okay and positive.

Nope. It happens in every single sub-reddit. It's just whether you're on the side that's targeted or not as to whether you feel it.

Re: Reddit Threatens to Remove Moderators from Subreddits Continuing Blackouts

#504

Reddit clearly doesn't understand the product. When users join a sub it's because they like the content and tacitly approve of the moderation. All but new users are aware that subs are governed by mods. Installing a corporate-approved mod panel because a community isn't acting in Reddit Inc's financial best interest is to light the whole product on fire. What's the point of starting a new sub if it'll be repurposed a…

> When users join a sub it's because they like the content and tacitly approve of the moderation.

I disagree, I see tons of people blaming admins for moderation actions and vice-versa.

Re: Reddit Threatens to Remove Moderators from Subreddits Continuing Blackouts

#505

Another day and another nail in another awesome online community that has terrible leadership. Where will the communities move to? What new areas of the Internet will be created?

https://squabbles.io is the best alternative I've seen. The Fediverse is a cool idea in theory but I think at this point in time it's not ready for primetime. It's too complicated for casual users to figure out, plus federation invites drama all of its own - e.g. Beehaw, a major Lemmy instance, has defederated with lemmy.world

The best part of reddit, for me, was that it focused primarily on the content, which had to be able to stand largely on its own. Usernames were attached to content, but they were secondary.

Other social media platforms are largely about the individual, the personality. The content, while present, seems to be secondary. Influencers run amok and are an advertisers wet dream.

Squabbles, self-admittedly [0], tries to combine these approaches.

When I look at their home page, as well as a few communities, the only thing that really stands out on each post is the "title bar" with someone's name and a follow link. There's no quick way to see what the content is about (unless it's an image), without actually diving into the meat of the content. I can't make a quick judgement call of whether I want to read the content or not, unless I base it on the person's name.

For some, that may be great. For me, it misses the mark and falls too far on the Twitter side of the hybrid approach.

If people find it a useful format, then I hope the site thrives. But I don't think it's the right fit for the niche that made reddit great.

[0] - https://squabbles.io/about

Re: Reddit Threatens to Remove Moderators from Subreddits Continuing Blackouts

#506
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What gives me hope is if you ever take a break from social media you realize how worthless it all is. It really doesn’t hurt to disengage. For similar reasons it’s possible for new networks to show up which disrupt the old, such as TikTok. The point is as individuals we are way less dependent on social media than we imagine.

For reddit specifically, I have to disagree. It's a sad state the Internet has become, where you used to get coherent results from decentralized blogs when you google a sufficiently niche hobbyist topic. These days you just get content marketing spam. Append reddit to your search and you get subject-matter experts. The valuable conversation and folk knowledge is all siloed on social media.

Makes you wonder how google search is still so profitable when the quality of information it returns has gotten progressively poorer.

Re: Reddit Threatens to Remove Moderators from Subreddits Continuing Blackouts

#508
post #292

Earlier quoted context omitted.

9 out of 10 days most Reddit mods are considered the scum of the earth, it's a literal meme at this point how bad a lot of them are. They are the heroes this week because it fits their narrative. Censorship, power-tripping, running subs with a iron fist, etc Nobody knows or cares who they are. As much as they'd like to think they are, the mods are not the community. The community is the people. The people are not the…

When an ump acts like 30,000 people came to the game to watch them and not their team.

They took the ball and went home. Some went through the motions of having a poll to try to legitimize it, as if the community would rather just shut down their subreddit for good because the mods feel disrespected.

Re: Reddit Threatens to Remove Moderators from Subreddits Continuing Blackouts

#509

Moderation on reddit was always pretty heavy-handed, arbitrary and unnecessary. Reddit should have removed most of them a long time ago (at least from the popular boards), but doing so now just looks distasteful.

Nah, it was overdue, and this provides an impetus to execute a purge which would have been hard to do before. Never let a crisis go to waste.

Re: Reddit Threatens to Remove Moderators from Subreddits Continuing Blackouts

#510
post #37
post #16

Sorry... but this was handled very poorly by reddit and its CEO. Should have just disabled the 'go private' option. A subreddit, is not 'owned' or property of a moderator. Eg, https://www.reddit.com/r/Brooklyn/ , should not be own by one person that decides what to do. The questions and answers are made by common people that want to see their content that they posted into the subreddit. They are not property of some…

> A subreddit, is not 'owned' or property of a moderator. That is exactly how reddit works. Reddit does not compensate the mods.. this is a minor compensation that they get to maintain their fiefdom. Don't like it, create a new sub.

It's a reasonable policy if we're talking about a very niche hobby. If it's /r/news or /r/nfl where the name serves as a natural Schelling point, then it will attract power-hungry people who are able to indulge their drive to control others with a large natural constituency that continues to flow into to their subs without any awareness of its governance.
Post reply on HN