Live data from Hacker News

GDPR: Don't Panic

jacquesmattheij.com

501–510 of 833 posts

Re: GDPR: Don't Panic

#501

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good lord, it's like you didn't read the article. Or, you're fine with a competitor who isn't afraid of entirely reasonable international laws coming in and eating your lunch.

We ran the numbers on how much it would cost to establish compliance, and with that alone it was barley worth it based on the current EU customer base we have. We also considered all the additional liability we’d be taking on, and with that alone it was barely worth it based on the current EU customer base we have. We’d also be very happy if one of our competitors started investing in the EU market. It’s worth about…

Or just ignore it, take on EU customers anyway, deal with the risk.

Re: GDPR: Don't Panic

#504

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately in the US, any conviction leads to essentially a work "blacklist," whereby employers do background checks and deny employment for anything they find within 7 years.

Not for non-violent misdemeanors. Unless you're a flagrant offender you will normally be slapped don the wrist and given a stern lecture in the form of a class. Source: was in a fraternity in the US where literally nothing bad happened to anyone I knew with a misdemeanor outside of a fine and class

A lot of companies won't hire you if you have a criminal record of any kind. Some won't even hire you if you have any record of arrest, regardless of conviction.

Which fraternity?

Re: GDPR: Don't Panic

#506

I can tell you that GDPR is going to cause issues with block based backups. Many hosting providers don't separate customers on different block devices. When you back up a block device you have snapshots that have many different organizations data on them. Part of making good backups is knowing that the backup can't change. The only solution now is to add paths to go back and modify those backups to remove customer da…

I've seen a lot of people talk about having a separate table for ids that should be removed when you restore a backup. It seems like a plan pretty viable solution, at least from what I've seen.

Re: GDPR: Don't Panic

#507

As a solo business owner based in the US, I’ve been spending the last couple weeks learning about GDPR and getting compliant. While it has not been a fun process, I do think in general the regulation is quite reasonable and overall good for the world in general. So far, GDPR compliance has not cost me any money, only time. There are three problems however that I have with GDPR and I’d love to hear how other small non…

> My email signup forms are very clear about marketing use, and are double opt in, and subscribers can opt out with a single click. But my research suggests that this is still not GDPR compliant unless there is an explicit consent, which I believe will reduce email signup rates.

But if it required user activity to register for those lists AND you explicitly identified them as for marketing purposes, that seems like you already HAVE consent? I mean, what do you imagine consent to mean other than "an active affirmation from the user that they're ok with this". If it's indeed double opt-in AND clearly communicated, it seems you clear that bar by a mile?

Re: GDPR: Don't Panic

#508

I can tell you that GDPR is going to cause issues with block based backups. Many hosting providers don't separate customers on different block devices. When you back up a block device you have snapshots that have many different organizations data on them. Part of making good backups is knowing that the backup can't change. The only solution now is to add paths to go back and modify those backups to remove customer da…

The solution is to keep a list of "things to exclude" if a backup is ever restored. This is reasonable. Rewriting old backups is not reasonable.

Re: GDPR: Don't Panic

#509
> There are several reasons for that, the major ones being: webservers only log IP addresses if you configure them to do so.

That’s not true. Apache and Nginx default logs IPs. Maybe OP should check his Nginx logs.

Post reply on HN