Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 39.0 released

mozilla.org

51–60 of 105 posts

Re: Firefox 39.0 released

#52
post #48

And yet there are still issues on my Sandy Bridge system with display corruption even with the latest Intel drivers. Also has anyone else noticed that Firefox is no longer keeping the page state when navigating back? For example on Reddit go to the comments section, minimize a few comments then navigate to a link then go back and none of the minimized comments remain minimized, in Firefox prior to 38 things worked co…

Yes I have noticed the exact same thing on Reddit lately. My guess it's because they started sending "Cache-Control: no-cache" which prevents Firefox to cache the page for the back button.

Ah yeah that makes sense, I thought it might have been something to do with their recent switch to HTTPS only.

Re: Firefox 39.0 released

#53
post #49

Probably unfair of me, but when browsers have a new .0 release, my brain automatically thinks "Oh good, new security bugs."

firefox is on a 6-week release schedule, and has been for a while. They increment a by whole number each time, but the for both chrome and FF they shouldn't really be thought of as .0 releases. It's a fairly minor, incremental change.

Re: Firefox 39.0 released

#54
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good. Breaking their websites is the only way some people will fix their broken security.

YES. Force them to upgrade their weak sites!

Which unfortunately costs time and money. Whilst yes, they should be up to date and secure, banks are pretty big businesses and require more time.

One day they'll catch up.

Re: Firefox 39.0 released

#55
post #16
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For what it's worth, I've just updated on OS X and scrolling feels just as janky as ever.

Same here. But I'll keep using Firefox because I cant stand what Chrome is doing with my cpu/memory/privacy and I want to keep Safari (the less 'usable' browser) for work related stuff and Firefox for personal ones, on another desktop space.

Two firefox profiles? One for work and one for personal?

Type "man firefox" into your terminal and you will see the relevant options and can set up aliases and shortcuts appropriate for your separated browsing needs.

Re: Firefox 39.0 released

#56
post #33
post #18

So, they finally fixed Logjam, 1 month and a half after publication. Chrome still hasn't fixed it. Color me unimpressed.

Since Chromium is open source, you can contribute to the project. I'm sure if you send a quality patch to the Chromium dev team to fix Logjam, they'd be willing to review it. Did you try to contribute to Chromium and Firefox to speed up fixing the Logjam issue ?

Why should one provide a patch for Google's browser. Google are rich they can do it themselves? The day that Chrome is a verified build of Chromium with all the Google centric stuff as optional add ons is the day sending Chromium patches makes sense.

Re: Firefox 39.0 released

#57
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

YES. Force them to upgrade their weak sites!

Which unfortunately costs time and money. Whilst yes, they should be up to date and secure, banks are pretty big businesses and require more time. One day they'll catch up.

But that's the inherent problem; these companies are still setup for a bureaucracy that works fine in a particular area of business, but completely crumbles under the new rules of the technological age. We shouldn't be apologetic for their resisting of change, but rather pushing them to take a long hard look at what needs to be reorganized to fit into the new paradigm.

Re: Firefox 39.0 released

#58

And yet there are still issues on my Sandy Bridge system with display corruption even with the latest Intel drivers. Also has anyone else noticed that Firefox is no longer keeping the page state when navigating back? For example on Reddit go to the comments section, minimize a few comments then navigate to a link then go back and none of the minimized comments remain minimized, in Firefox prior to 38 things worked co…

wait, display corruption?

Is that when these black bars flicker across my screen about once every hour or so when ff is open?

I thought my gpu was dying...

Re: Firefox 39.0 released

#60
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How so? If you're white, perhaps you see no problem with making everyone's skin white. But the billions of people who aren't white might have a problem with it.

The color was not specified before, so it was up to the font creator. I think yellow was the most common choice. The test page shows all the icons as blue in my browser. I'm not against the new changes, but I think the old version was more popular in Asian countries than anywhere else, and wasn't really pro-white.

Well, Apple made them mostly white. White people holding hands, white people praying, a white family.

Google and Microsoft’s neutral yellow was a lot more neutral there, yes.

Post reply on HN