Probably unfair of me, but when browsers have a new .0 release, my brain automatically thinks "Oh good, new security bugs."
Firefox 39.0 released
51–60 of 105 posts
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#52And yet there are still issues on my Sandy Bridge system with display corruption even with the latest Intel drivers. Also has anyone else noticed that Firefox is no longer keeping the page state when navigating back? For example on Reddit go to the comments section, minimize a few comments then navigate to a link then go back and none of the minimized comments remain minimized, in Firefox prior to 38 things worked co…
Yes I have noticed the exact same thing on Reddit lately. My guess it's because they started sending "Cache-Control: no-cache" which prevents Firefox to cache the page for the back button.
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#53Probably unfair of me, but when browsers have a new .0 release, my brain automatically thinks "Oh good, new security bugs."
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Good. Breaking their websites is the only way some people will fix their broken security.
YES. Force them to upgrade their weak sites!
One day they'll catch up.
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
For what it's worth, I've just updated on OS X and scrolling feels just as janky as ever.
Same here. But I'll keep using Firefox because I cant stand what Chrome is doing with my cpu/memory/privacy and I want to keep Safari (the less 'usable' browser) for work related stuff and Firefox for personal ones, on another desktop space.
Type "man firefox" into your terminal and you will see the relevant options and can set up aliases and shortcuts appropriate for your separated browsing needs.
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#56So, they finally fixed Logjam, 1 month and a half after publication. Chrome still hasn't fixed it. Color me unimpressed.
Since Chromium is open source, you can contribute to the project. I'm sure if you send a quality patch to the Chromium dev team to fix Logjam, they'd be willing to review it. Did you try to contribute to Chromium and Firefox to speed up fixing the Logjam issue ?
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
YES. Force them to upgrade their weak sites!
Which unfortunately costs time and money. Whilst yes, they should be up to date and secure, banks are pretty big businesses and require more time. One day they'll catch up.
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#58And yet there are still issues on my Sandy Bridge system with display corruption even with the latest Intel drivers. Also has anyone else noticed that Firefox is no longer keeping the page state when navigating back? For example on Reddit go to the comments section, minimize a few comments then navigate to a link then go back and none of the minimized comments remain minimized, in Firefox prior to 38 things worked co…
Is that when these black bars flicker across my screen about once every hour or so when ff is open?
I thought my gpu was dying...
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#59This is going to make me never use Chrome dev tools again. Nice
Re: Firefox 39.0 released
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
How so? If you're white, perhaps you see no problem with making everyone's skin white. But the billions of people who aren't white might have a problem with it.
The color was not specified before, so it was up to the font creator. I think yellow was the most common choice. The test page shows all the icons as blue in my browser. I'm not against the new changes, but I think the old version was more popular in Asian countries than anywhere else, and wasn't really pro-white.
Google and Microsoft’s neutral yellow was a lot more neutral there, yes.