I think you messed up the quality.
http://i.imgur.com/RZzliBF.png
Compare to the original:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c5/Bit...
Icons of all main payment operators and methods
51–60 of 65 posts
Re: Icons of all main payment operators and methods
#52What is the name of the font used to generate the paths for the bank transfer, cash on delivery and other text-based icons?
Re: Icons of all main payment operators and methods
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, they don't. They looked horrible in Chrome for a long time because Chrome's rendering was screwed up unless you gave it fonts in a very specific order so it used SVG. Fun fact, Google Web Fonts never served it in that very specific order.
Yes they do. Evidence: http://i.imgur.com/WAqvAmv.png They have rough edges, wrong aspect ration in small sizes and look nasty.
Judging by the jagginess and the low resolution of your screen, I'd wager you're using one of the laptops with an integrated GPU that's using an older version of the drivers that's on the Firefox GPU blacklist. This is usually because the laptop maker doesn't bother to update the graphics drivers much, if at all, and doesn't get the improved ones from Intel/AMD/etc. These outdated and buggy graphics drivers cause apps that use hardware acceleration to crash, so Firefox is running with it off on your laptop. Mozilla maintains a blacklist of known bad versions of graphics drivers and will automatically disable hardware acceleration on those machines so that it won't crash. With it off, web pages won't look as good and web fonts won't be as smooth.
Neither my laptop nor my desktop suffer this issue with Firefox, Chrome, IE, etc.
Re: Icons of all main payment operators and methods
#54Awesome job, however, it would be nice if people contributed to a more widely used Icon Font library such as FontAwesome. Obviously to prevent multiple CSS/font file calls, etc.
On the contrary, if you only need a couple icons, having 1000+ different symbols in a single font library is unnecessary overhead as well.
Re: Icons of all main payment operators and methods
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not Chrome, it's Firefox. Looks the same on my machine as well, all jaggedy. I'm using FF 36. Let me go update and see if there's a difference... No difference on 37. They just look terrible. http://i.imgur.com/exrS0u9.png EDIT: Wow, looks like turning ClearType OFF makes the font icons look much better: http://i.imgur.com/dwwagZN.png Interesting.
Wow. I can't believe it's 2015 and both Chrome and Firefox are still battling text antialiasing bugs.
It's likely an issue with buggy video drivers. Firefox has a database of drivers on a blacklist that will crash due to instability. When it detects them in use, it will disable hardware acceleration which decreases performance and quality of some things like font rendering. Judging by the earlier screenshot, this is on a lower end laptop at 1366x768 resolution with an integrated graphics card. Most laptop makers never update the bundled drivers to fix bugs even though Intel and AMD regularly update the drivers of their integrated graphics tech. So, users are stuck with an outdated buggy driver and no way to update it. Mozilla at least ensures that it won't crash.
Re: Icons of all main payment operators and methods
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, they don't. They looked horrible in Chrome for a long time because Chrome's rendering was screwed up unless you gave it fonts in a very specific order so it used SVG. Fun fact, Google Web Fonts never served it in that very specific order.
Yes they do. Evidence: http://i.imgur.com/WAqvAmv.png They have rough edges, wrong aspect ration in small sizes and look nasty.
It looks fine to me ( http://i.imgur.com/rAYGIwX.png ).
What fork of firefox is that? I don't recognise the taskbar icon. Does the problem still happen with upstream firefox?
Re: Icons of all main payment operators and methods
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably not the fade itself but the copy-to-clipboard functionality.
it's a terrible UX for those that have flash disabled by default
I have click-to-play enabled, so I'm used to seeing small grey rectangles pop up when I hover over things. I think even GitHub does that.
Re: Icons of all main payment operators and methods
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes they do. Evidence: http://i.imgur.com/WAqvAmv.png They have rough edges, wrong aspect ration in small sizes and look nasty.
It looks fine to me ( http://i.imgur.com/rAYGIwX.png ). What fork of firefox is that? I don't recognise the taskbar icon. Does the problem still happen with upstream firefox?
Tor Browser, likely. It's based on the older ESR branch of Firefox. As it's a modified version of Firefox, it's unsupported by Mozilla.
Re: Icons of all main payment operators and methods
#59Why aren't you guys just opening issues with Icon requests etc over at PaymentFont GitHub repo?
Seems odd to me to just complain about missing operators, assuming one could know every single one on the earth...
Re: Icons of all main payment operators and methods
#60Seems like paypal donation link has not been setup properly. It says 0$
Seems like it just lets u decide how much u want to donate, theres a small field beneath where it says 0$