Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rob from Twilio here - appreciate the feedback. Have you had an opportunity to check out TaskRouter yet? We released it a few weeks ago - definitely my favorite recent product that works with Twilio Voice: https://www.twilio.com/taskrouter
Interesting; however in my opinion I'd redesign that page. Having a lot of the information behind the interactive scrolling will cause it to be lost. Personally, and I know a lot of others, just scroll the page and look for the relevant information in paragraph form. Much easier to digest. This implementation forces me to stay on the page and is a bit frustrating.
Twilio Video – Real-time WebRTC video infrastructure
51–60 of 106 posts
Re: Twilio Video – Real-time WebRTC video infrastructure
#52Are there any plans for Twilio to integrate this with the SIP side of things (e.g. Twilio providing a media server to enable WebRTC clients to communicate with SIP clients and also call out to traditional phone clients?)
Re: Twilio Video – Real-time WebRTC video infrastructure
#53I did a lot of testing of a few WebRTC platforms last summer for a product idea that we had. I came to the conclusion that on mobile phones, WebRTC video is not yet usable. Even with just audio on a cellular network, call quality started deteriorating after a few minutes on every platform that I tried. Video without a WiFi signal was hopeless. I discussed this with an WebRTC expert, and the problems are partly with W…
However, ORTC does seek to improve with simulcast/SVC, and attributes of ORTC will merge into WebRTC as well, ultimately providing more hooks, finer-grained control and better instrumentation/visibility to the upper layers.
All that said, you can do acceptable quality WebRTC voice and video over 4G LTE today. But you do need a rock solid signal and be prepared to with a fully charged battery if you are not plugged in.
Re: Twilio Video – Real-time WebRTC video infrastructure
#54Anyone know how this compares with icecomm? ( http://icecomm.io/ ) I was quite impressed with how easy it was to set up icecomm .. are twilio upping the ante here in any way that I should know about?
Re: Twilio Video – Real-time WebRTC video infrastructure
#55Although it's great to see Twilio branching out into this space, with their recent product releases they do seem to be losing focus on their original Twilio Voice product. Compared to other prodividers their prices really aren't conpetitive, but Twiml is so much more flexible and easier to use than VoiceXML. What to do? :/
Re: Twilio Video – Real-time WebRTC video infrastructure
#56Re: Twilio Video – Real-time WebRTC video infrastructure
#57Re: Twilio Video – Real-time WebRTC video infrastructure
#58Re: Twilio Video – Real-time WebRTC video infrastructure
#59I did a lot of testing of a few WebRTC platforms last summer for a product idea that we had. I came to the conclusion that on mobile phones, WebRTC video is not yet usable. Even with just audio on a cellular network, call quality started deteriorating after a few minutes on every platform that I tried. Video without a WiFi signal was hopeless. I discussed this with an WebRTC expert, and the problems are partly with W…
What I've been wondering is if Apple gets any QoS concessions from the carriers for Facetime, because it usually works pretty well on 4G. Not sure if Facetime's quality is due to robust error correction, or because they've been able to wrangle special QCI/bearer status for Facetime data.
> mobile phones, WebRTC video is not yet usable
Once VoLTE + Video becomes common (eg, Verizon Advanced Calling), then it'll be interesting to see the impact on video-call quality, and whether V/VoLTE sessions can be established with the other end of a SIP trunk, and hence (browser) WebRTC from there.
Re: Twilio Video – Real-time WebRTC video infrastructure
#60Anyone know how this compares with icecomm? ( http://icecomm.io/ ) I was quite impressed with how easy it was to set up icecomm .. are twilio upping the ante here in any way that I should know about?