Sounds interesting! But you should change your CSS for the links. It is not really pleasant and not very practical not to know which text is clickable. Try to find the only link of my site at first glance... http://sitekite.com/find-the-link-npxtDQ
Show HN: Sitekite – Imgur for Websites
51–57 of 57 posts
Re: Show HN: Sitekite – Imgur for Websites
#52Sounds interesting! But you should change your CSS for the links. It is not really pleasant and not very practical not to know which text is clickable. Try to find the only link of my site at first glance... http://sitekite.com/find-the-link-npxtDQ
I edited my site and then its address changed... Is it normal? "Find the link" is now at this address: http://sitekite.com/find-the-link-mxOa_Q
By the way, it's evidently that the linked word is "here" :) (they should solve that too).
Re: Show HN: Sitekite – Imgur for Websites
#53I like this, but I can't think of the use case where I would actually use it. I'll think about it as I'm living my everyday internet life and see if I can find one, because I love the easy "create and share" concept generally. What's the use case you imagined when you built it? What need did you have?
Re: Show HN: Sitekite – Imgur for Websites
#54Re: Show HN: Sitekite – Imgur for Websites
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
I edited my site and then its address changed... Is it normal? "Find the link" is now at this address: http://sitekite.com/find-the-link-mxOa_Q
Yes, your link edit caused app error when clicked the older one. This is not very SEO friendly but hey, just launched! Congrats. By the way, it's evidently that the linked word is "here" :) (they should solve that too).
Re: Show HN: Sitekite – Imgur for Websites
#56This has potential. When drop.io died nothing filled the gap. If you want some help with this feel free to reach out to me: rrggrr@gmx.us
Re: Show HN: Sitekite – Imgur for Websites
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Blog sites typically need signup, so are slower to get started with than this. Also if you think of something like Blogger, it would not be as clean/minimal out of the box if you just want a clean 'single page' to link someone to. If you care that little about the way you are presenting your information that you can't even be bothered to sign up, you most likely don't care about having fancy HTML formatting. The re…
>> If you care that little about the way you are presenting your information that you can't even be bothered to sign up, you most likely don't care about having fancy HTML formatting. Who says choosing Sitekite would mean I care little about presentation? Sitekite does a better job than (to use my original example, Blogger) for its intended 'share a single page of info' use-case. >> The reason why most blogs require…
The intersection of people who are able to write their own HTML but absolutely refuse to sign up with a fake email, or get their own VPS really comes down to 2 types of people.
Paranoids
Phishers
Both of which are tiny minorities.
> Ugly.
And how is this relevant when you are writing raw html?