Live data from Hacker News

European Parliament votes in favour of breaking up Google

bbc.co.uk

51–60 of 179 posts

Re: European Parliament votes in favour of breaking up Google

#51
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The intention was never to break them up. MEPs calling for it is just to show the EU Commission that they have the political support to take the gloves off. If you actually want to know the justification for the EU doing this you should read this paper by Ben Edelman. http://www.benedelman.org/publications/google-tying-2014-10-... He's consulted for various Google competitors but he's also a professor at Harvard Busi…

If by "consulted", you mean that Ben has been paid to come up with papers exactly like this for various anti-google lobbies, many many times over the past 10 years, then yes, he has "consulted". Ben has literally no legal training in antitrust law that i'm aware of, so his opining on it is somewhat interesting. (I edited this comment because Ben does have a JD from Harvard law that I forgot about, so he does have leg…

Do you work for Google? If you do, ny the same metric, shouldn't we discount all your numerous posts defending Google and attacking their competitors?

Re: European Parliament votes in favour of breaking up Google

#52

EU bureaucracy logic at its best - go after google and microsoft, but we let apple do whatever they want. For me they with their closed ecosystem are both bigger danger and more anti competitive than both Google and Microsoft combined. Or at least force them to accept other web browsers in their store.

Apple is completely opt-in unlike Microsoft and Google.

Can you elaborate? How is Microsoft not opt-in?

Re: European Parliament votes in favour of breaking up Google

#53
post #29
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It can happen due to 1) significant numbers of users flagging the link, 2) the admins demoting it, or 3) it attracting too many comments too quickly ("controversiality"). It seems likely 1 and 3 happened here, but due to a lack of transparency it's always impossible to rule out 2.

It may be "controversial," but it is also big news and very HN-worthy. Disappointing to see that HN's algorithms are so trigger-happy

The resulting discussion is mostly not very interesting though. Maybe the algorithms are doing a better job than we thought!

Re: European Parliament votes in favour of breaking up Google

#54
post #30

To copy from the previous discussion: I was blocked indefinitely from Adsense by Google's faulty algorithms (without explanation and with appeals rejected without explanation). I lost the revenue I'd earnt that month, and soon realised Google holds a monopoly in this space, and no one else offered a comparable service. I'm all for Google's stronghold to be broken. reply

Or people being locked out of their GMail account This is the problem, and customer service in Google barely solves anything.

Which customer service are you talking about?

Re: European Parliament votes in favour of breaking up Google

#55
post #28
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Europe is not the same as its government, just as the US is not the same as the US government. Btw, European Parliament is also not the same as Europe government. It has much weaker influence on things than a typical parliament of a country.

Exactly. There's a lot less cohesion and a lot less centralized power. Some European governments ship politicians off to Euro-government just to get them out of the way. Perhaps not quite justly, the Euro Parliament is sometimes considered a retirement institution for incompetent politicians.

Yeah but my point was not about the eurogoverment in general.

It was about the EU Parliament being weak even in relation to the other parts of the eurogovernment. I meant the EU Council in particular.

Re: European Parliament votes in favour of breaking up Google

#56
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If by "consulted", you mean that Ben has been paid to come up with papers exactly like this for various anti-google lobbies, many many times over the past 10 years, then yes, he has "consulted". Ben has literally no legal training in antitrust law that i'm aware of, so his opining on it is somewhat interesting. (I edited this comment because Ben does have a JD from Harvard law that I forgot about, so he does have leg…

Do you work for Google? If you do, ny the same metric, shouldn't we discount all your numerous posts defending Google and attacking their competitors?

According to this post, they do.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8620539

It would be nice to have that in a disclaimer in the posts discussing Google or in the HN profile page though.

Re: European Parliament votes in favour of breaking up Google

#57
post #5

As someone living in Europe, I think they don't realize that, in a way, Google is bigger than the European Parliament. The citizens of Europe barely take the European Parliament seriously, and there's not much reason for Google to. I happen to be a fan of Duck Duck Go. But I think Google can do without Europe more easily than Europe can do without Google. There's no need to go to extremes, either. Just like Microsoft…

>The citizens of Europe barely take the European Parliament seriously

Mainly because all the real power rests in the (unelected) European commission.

Re: European Parliament votes in favour of breaking up Google

#58
A monopoly should be defined by barriers to entry, not just market share. There's nothing preventing other large companies from entering the search space, and in fact many of them have (yahoo, microsoft, etc).

There are true monopolistic firms like Comcast or Time Warner, where there are serious logistic/economic barriers preventing other firms from entering the market. This doesn't seem like one of them to me.

Re: European Parliament votes in favour of breaking up Google

#59
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you work for Google? If you do, ny the same metric, shouldn't we discount all your numerous posts defending Google and attacking their competitors?

According to this post, they do. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8620539 It would be nice to have that in a disclaimer in the posts discussing Google or in the HN profile page though.

Sounds awesome. Let's do that for everyone. We can put my NSA affiliation in there too.

In the history of this site nobody has ever made themselves look smarter or been more persuasive by accusing another HN commenter of being a shill.

Re: European Parliament votes in favour of breaking up Google

#60
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If by "consulted", you mean that Ben has been paid to come up with papers exactly like this for various anti-google lobbies, many many times over the past 10 years, then yes, he has "consulted". Ben has literally no legal training in antitrust law that i'm aware of, so his opining on it is somewhat interesting. (I edited this comment because Ben does have a JD from Harvard law that I forgot about, so he does have leg…

Do you work for Google? If you do, ny the same metric, shouldn't we discount all your numerous posts defending Google and attacking their competitors?

I do work for Google, but i explicitly don't speak for them on HN. I also don't work for Google Legal, and don't work on issues related to this stuff. I have opined on this stuff long before i worked for Google, and will long after.

Google literally does not pay me for my views on this.

Ben is literally paid for his anti-google views on this stuff.

You are of course, welcome to discount whatever you like. You should always read and judge everything critically :)

Post reply on HN