Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

How many of you use a Linux distro as your primary desktop OS?

news.ycombinator.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 68 posts

Re: How many of you use a Linux distro as your primary desktop OS?

#51

Post by yzzxy »

slashnull wrote: post #46
yzzxy wrote: post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been dreaming of a fully rebuilt hacker-friendly OS for a while. Trouble is, it's hard to justify development, even for FOSS, unless you can find some kind of hook for the mainstream, for reasons that may not seem apparent at first. Chief among these concerns: isn't it a little insular to create an OS that will only be used by people with the utility to write their own software? At some point, the software must…

Really at this point it's fair to say the the current Linux desktop stack is already a miracle; a backwards-incompatible rebuild is just impossible, or at least with the current state of the mainstream UI development tools. Which, on the other hand, I think is rapidly evolving, now that OOP is out of its hype phase, and can now be evaluated a bit more (pun almost intended) objectively, and freed from its unnecessary…

I was just thinking about the battle that would have to be fought to keep JS away from becoming the standard scripting language. JS is a mess - there are people doing great things with it like React, but it's a mess. There's a total lack of design philosophy at the heart of the language, necessitating things like "The Good Parts."

I think the main scripting language for an OS should at be considered near-perfect when the OS begins - like C for Unix. One of the design goals for that language should be to work well for graphical UI - imagine if a framework like React had a language designed around it instead of being shoehorned onto JS. We could start talking about ideas like separating the layout, styling, and interactive components in a better balance than that between HTML, CSS, and JS.

Really my main point is - There's a conversation to be had around starting from (near) scratch. I think in the end a lot of *nix would have to be incorporated to deal with the realities of hardware and established protocols, but we could also look at starting in a VM and working towards bare metal. Or cave and include POSIX-style standards in a way that is not limiting to desktop OS design.

Re: How many of you use a Linux distro as your primary desktop OS?

#52

Post by yzzxy »

dllthomas wrote: post #49
yzzxy wrote: post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been dreaming of a fully rebuilt hacker-friendly OS for a while. Trouble is, it's hard to justify development, even for FOSS, unless you can find some kind of hook for the mainstream, for reasons that may not seem apparent at first. Chief among these concerns: isn't it a little insular to create an OS that will only be used by people with the utility to write their own software? At some point, the software must…

"At some point, the software must be developed on the OS it runs on" I'm not sure that's really true, particularly with emulation.

Ok, how about:

"At some point, the software is most easily developed on the OS it runs on"

There are exceptions to the rule of course, but much of the time development is going to happen on the target OS or in some kind of interlinked system with the target OS.

Re: How many of you use a Linux distro as your primary desktop OS?

#54

Post by dllthomas »

yzzxy wrote: post #52
dllthomas wrote: post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"At some point, the software must be developed on the OS it runs on" I'm not sure that's really true, particularly with emulation.

Ok, how about: "At some point, the software is most easily developed on the OS it runs on" There are exceptions to the rule of course, but much of the time development is going to happen on the target OS or in some kind of interlinked system with the target OS.

"in some kind of interlinked system with the target OS."

I think that's very much the case, depending on just what you mean by interlinked, but that provides a strong out for developers wishing to primarily use another system.

Re: How many of you use a Linux distro as your primary desktop OS?

#57

Post by yzzxy »

dllthomas wrote: post #54
yzzxy wrote: post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok, how about: "At some point, the software is most easily developed on the OS it runs on" There are exceptions to the rule of course, but much of the time development is going to happen on the target OS or in some kind of interlinked system with the target OS.

"in some kind of interlinked system with the target OS." I think that's very much the case, depending on just what you mean by interlinked, but that provides a strong out for developers wishing to primarily use another system.

An example would be XCode/iOS. This (as I understand it) largely requires iOS and OSX to have similar kernels.

My claim becomes strained when you move away from desktop applications. I really meant - if you're a coder, and you want to use some awesome ideal hacker desktop that moves away from the institutions of today, that desktop better be useful for consumers or you're going to be complaining about Acme BigCo not releasing their apps on your platform. Linux already gets that problem enough and it's part of a 30+ year lineage.

Obviously people on a toy OS with enough features can develop things for other platforms, but it would be nice if there was enough of a mainstream install base to allow developers to develop on the same platform they love to use.

Re: How many of you use a Linux distro as your primary desktop OS?

#58

Post by dllthomas »

yzzxy wrote: post #57
dllthomas wrote: post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"in some kind of interlinked system with the target OS." I think that's very much the case, depending on just what you mean by interlinked, but that provides a strong out for developers wishing to primarily use another system.

An example would be XCode/iOS. This (as I understand it) largely requires iOS and OSX to have similar kernels. My claim becomes strained when you move away from desktop applications. I really meant - if you're a coder, and you want to use some awesome ideal hacker desktop that moves away from the institutions of today, that desktop better be useful for consumers or you're going to be complaining about Acme BigCo not…

In no respect does it require any relationship between the two kernels.

Your new claim - that you're not going to get much commercial development targeting the platform without broad appeal - is certainly very much the case. Ideally these could be run virtualized. Or maybe developers are better without the distractions :-P

Re: How many of you use a Linux distro as your primary desktop OS?

#59

Post by switch007 »

1) Ubuntu, for about 10 years

2) My entire career is based on Linux. I run Linux on my desktop so I can run all kinds of virtualisation, play with new kernel features, experiment etc. I enjoy the freedoms and control I can exert over my OS.

3) No. I'll move away from Linux when hell freezes over. I'm actually typing this on a Mac, but it's not mine, so that's how I sleep at night ;)

Re: How many of you use a Linux distro as your primary desktop OS?

#60

Post by SEJeff »

atmosx wrote: post #6

I don't see any serious advantages for using GNU/Linux over MacOSX because I live in userland and I can get all my gnu utils and open source programs through MacPorts. Linux is a programmer's paradise and you can basically whatever you wanna do with the system. IMHO the most serious lack is a set of good looking office programs and some lack of interoperability when you needed. On the other hand you get to have much…

Funny enough, thinks like Office 365 (the cloud enabled Microsoft Office that runs in Azure) and Google Docs are making this less and less of a valid point every day.
Post reply on HN