> Nothing could be less cool than calling a startup “cool.com” cuil.com had its 15 minutes of fame, but I see that Google acquired their patents and domain names: http://searchengineland.com/googler-killer-cuil-patent-appli... http://whois.domaintools.com/cuil.com http://whois.domaintools.com/cuil.net
“Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
51–60 of 70 posts
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#52Capitalize the first letter of a noun and remove vowels at will. Example, sewage => Sewg
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#53I went through a couple of namegenerators and I found bustaname.com to be the best of the lot - specially it's realtime domain availability check (.com/.org/.net)
Pair it with namechk.com to check availability of social media handles.
If you are looking for random 4/5/6 letter domains that might be available (mostly sedo) then domainnamesoup.com is at it - eg: http://www.domainnamesoup.com/5letterdomainnames.php
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#54Reddit was "seemingly taken over by teenage boys" ... was there a time it wasn't. Love that. Love reddit. Also, dotomator can be useful for generating ideas. http://www.dotomator.com/
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#55Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#56Reddit was "seemingly taken over by teenage boys" ... was there a time it wasn't. Love that. Love reddit. Also, dotomator can be useful for generating ideas. http://www.dotomator.com/
Around late 2005-2006 it wasn't so bad, it was more 20-something guys in tech. A significant enough portion of the articles on the front page were related to programming or tech-real topics (esp. startups), or long-read articles, and while there was bickering, there were also interesting discussions in comments that didn't get dragged down by trolls and teenage-boyness. By 2007 the kids ranting about politics and ath…
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#57I genuinely felt embarrassed when I explained to them that the majority of startups etc have "silly" names. As I was talking about Anorak to them, every time I said it's name, I felt silly.
And yet, it's never bothered me before.
I'm not changing the name, but it made me realise.
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#58All you need to produce a 'good' name is a simple script, a list of adjectives and a list of critters. A few sample runs from my proprietary name generator produces these CamelCased (KamlKzed?) marvels of ingenuity: FragrantDuck CourteousOwl RecklessPig OtherMoose CaringFrog MindlessFish UpbeatLizard WhisperedHippo SlushyWhale OilyAccountant CompassionateHog InstructiveMonkey ForkedCow ... Of course I did not work on…
My startup name generator[1] does something very similar. Instead of adjectives and critters it uses tech and culinary terms. Here's the first 5 it came up with: SteamWare MountFont CaviarBeta ChipBinary SystemCocoa [1] http://montanaflynn.me/lab/startup-name-generator/
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
My startup name generator[1] does something very similar. Instead of adjectives and critters it uses tech and culinary terms. Here's the first 5 it came up with: SteamWare MountFont CaviarBeta ChipBinary SystemCocoa [1] http://montanaflynn.me/lab/startup-name-generator/
I got FragmentSalad, a great name. Haven't thought of a company to go with it yet, but that shouldn't hold me back...
Re: “Startup Names” by Paul Graham (2006)
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Around late 2005-2006 it wasn't so bad, it was more 20-something guys in tech. A significant enough portion of the articles on the front page were related to programming or tech-real topics (esp. startups), or long-read articles, and while there was bickering, there were also interesting discussions in comments that didn't get dragged down by trolls and teenage-boyness. By 2007 the kids ranting about politics and ath…
But you can't really generalize about Reddit nowadays, as it's a collection of tens of thousands of subreddits. There are still plenty that are fine.