> No. The proportional list system prevents representativeness. The people whose name is on the list represent the one that put them on it. They do not represent the electors.
Then I'm not sure what you mean. That you don't like standard representational democracy, whereby voters grant power to politicians for a limited timeframe but cannot control directly what they do during this time?
> > Separation of powers: not happening in Spain. The most voted political party in the legislative elections forms government.
> > That's not how separation of power works...
> Exactly. I was explaining what happens in Spain.
That's the same thing elsewhere. What do you expect to see instead?
> The electors should have a contract with their representative and if they are not loyal to that contract they can be ceased.
That's definitely an idea, though it seems tricky to put in place.
> It makes sense if you think about the different characteristics that you look for in a legislator in contrast to the values required to be a president. A legislator should be loyal to their representatives (a part) whereas what you are looking in a governor is intelligence to guide the Nation (all). It is nonsense to think that a good legislator could be a good PM (UK). Loyalty vs intelligence, that's why it should be different elections.
I expect that legislator look to their conscience first (if they can find it...) and to their party second. I also contest the underlying idea that an election campaign is a test of intelligence.