"Hey, Twitter! Hey, Facebook! Here we are! We know how to do this! Hire us, hire us, hire us!!!".
At least that's how I read the story. And I'm quite convinced it's their intent. Which shouldn't be a bad thing too.
51–60 of 100 posts
"Hey, Twitter! Hey, Facebook! Here we are! We know how to do this! Hire us, hire us, hire us!!!".
At least that's how I read the story. And I'm quite convinced it's their intent. Which shouldn't be a bad thing too.
I wish them the best of luck in whatever they do next!
What about poker night? Still hosting it in Arlington?
I'm, impressed though. You stuck with it for a long time and handled the shutdown right and without a ton of fanfare. If only you hadn't lost all that money to me in Poker, you might have been able to keep running... ;)
Give Abby my best!
The whole story seems to repeatedly wave the arms and shout: "Hey, Twitter! Hey, Facebook! Here we are! We know how to do this! Hire us, hire us, hire us!!!". At least that's how I read the story. And I'm quite convinced it's their intent. Which shouldn't be a bad thing too.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Profitability enough to offset opportunity cost" Interesting thought. One can make a (conceptual) ladder with "ramen profitable" being rung 1 and "opportunity profitable" being rung 2.
I use some different terms (as a business coach, with my team's frameworks etc) but the point is valid. Getting "ramen profitable" helps give a business owner confidence, which we call "the first brick wall of business". The only way out of this in a positive, growth direction is to invest in the right things and get profitable - and that means genuinely profitable, not just paying yourself $12K/yr and ignoring the o…
I don't have the hubris to say I can judge which is worse.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Give, or sell, shares? I am just wondering if you consider YC involvement so valuable that you would actually hand over shares just to have them on board in a venture.
thats quite common for advisary board positions (usually < 1%)