Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm guessing that, if the transaction is rejected, then no fees are awarded -- I could be wrong though.
yeah, I'm thinking that if that is the case, it would allow you to create a "spike" contract, a highly funded contract designed to use a lot of miner resources until it inevitably fails. then you could send out transactions to this contract which would cause it to execute and fuck with all the other miners, where you just ignore it because you know it will fail. Maybe the cost for computation makes this unreasonable…
Ethereum: A Turing-Complete Cryptocurrency
51–60 of 88 posts
Re: Ethereum: A Turing-Complete Cryptocurrency
#52Note that Bitcoin is purposefully not turing complete. http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/17258/turing-comp...
What am I missing? Is the idea that without loops the transaction size can be used to estimate the computation required without actually performing it, and thus the appropriately sized transaction fee required?
Re: Ethereum: A Turing-Complete Cryptocurrency
#53Re: Ethereum: A Turing-Complete Cryptocurrency
#54Ripple is also working on the same thing and is supposedly releasing them "soon": https://ripple.com/wiki/Contracts
Unfortunately, Ripple is a worst-case example of pre-mining. I would really hate to see it take off.
Re: Ethereum: A Turing-Complete Cryptocurrency
#55Trying to figure out a couple things (from pastebin link): 1. What protection against non-halting? contracts are "funded" upon creation, and by those who issue transactions to the contract. if there are specific fees required by the contract to perform an action, it must be enforced by the contract itself. the cost of computation will eventually exhaust the contract's funding it fails. 2. what are the long-term econo…
I don't think anyone associates ether with a drug first. From Thesaurus: "ether - the fifth and highest element after air and earth and fire and water; was believed to be the substance composing all heavenly bodies"
Ethers are also a group of rather common organical compounds in chemistry. This is the page Wikipedia gives you when searching "Ether", as gateway allures to. Apparently, a specific compound of those (diethyl ether) can be used as a drug. Seems rather unlikely to me that people would connect the name to the drug first.
Re: Ethereum: A Turing-Complete Cryptocurrency
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
There aren't thousands of validating nodes. All nodes are computing on jobs in the system. The incentive is you get paid for processing code for someone. It's a trusted cloud framework with payment built in. The Dagger page is down. That'll have the detail on the rewards details for compute.
Do you have the text for the dagger page?
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:0RAOB-M...
I don't see anything regarding compute rewards here. It's all about the mining PoW. If all nodes are validating the Turing-complete scripts, and only the miners are getting paid, how does that work? What am I missing?
Re: Ethereum: A Turing-Complete Cryptocurrency
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fee goes to the miner who happens to find the containing block, yes. But not to the thousands of validating nodes integral to the network. And over time fees are given proportional to hashpower... which doesn't make any kind of sense. The incentives are all messed up.
There aren't thousands of validating nodes. All nodes are computing on jobs in the system. The incentive is you get paid for processing code for someone. It's a trusted cloud framework with payment built in. The Dagger page is down. That'll have the detail on the rewards details for compute.
Re: Ethereum: A Turing-Complete Cryptocurrency
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except it pays the wrong people. In Bitcoin, at least, miners are kept honest by other people running nodes that limit what miners can do. In this protocol the validation would become very expensive but only the miners are paid. This sounds like trouble.
Don't all the miners have to run the entire program, so they are validating each other?
Re: Ethereum: A Turing-Complete Cryptocurrency
#59The page doesn't say who is behind it, but the wiki is edited by user "vbuterin". So maybe it's Vitalik Buterin, one of the more interesting cryptocurrency thinkers out there. Hmm. http://about.me/vitalik_buterin