Live data from Hacker News

SixCalifornias - initiative to create six states

sixcalifornias.info

51–59 of 59 posts

Re: SixCalifornias - initiative to create six states

#51
post #42

Well, there is probably a greater cultural gap between San Francisco and Los Angeles than exists between Fargo and Little Rock. And I do have a preference for smaller and more responsive polities. But with my foil hat on, I realize that this is a play by non-Californians to manipulate national politics at the expense of the states. I'll only support it if they do California, Texas, Florida, Illinois, and New York at…

> cultural gap between San Francisco and Los Angeles I'm curious as to what you think this gap is.

Ethnic makeup and degree of local homogeniety. Urban density. Use of public transportation. Historical points of interest. Dominant industries. Automobile culture. Access to green space. Consumer habits. Weather patterns. Air quality. Even the color of the surrounding landscape is different. Is it not clear to you that they just "feel" like completely different places, and that different kinds of people live there?

Re: SixCalifornias - initiative to create six states

#52
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How else could you do it? Tax only the people in favor of infrastructure improvements and prevent everyone else from using them? Only arrest people using recreational drugs if they voted against legalization?

You could do it the way it is done now. Geographically.

I'm looking to adverbialize a gerund. Gerrymanderingly? Gerrymandrically? Gerrymanderibly?

How it's done now is by politicians counting votes and setting the boundaries for their own benefit. This would be another--more permanent--opportunity for them to do that.

Re: SixCalifornias - initiative to create six states

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. We must preserve diversity... by crushing it under a single government. Power to the people... the people in Sacramento, am I right? Keep on trying to control the frame ("weird rich kids", "embarrassment", "hearts and minds"). We've reached peak centralization. The future is decentralization, subsidiary, and localized control.

I'm not sure you actually made a cogent argument I can respond to. The future is whatever we make it to be, and I don't like your vision of the future, and you aren't very good at convincing me to see the merits of what you want. What you want seems to be standard troglodyte big government is bad. This state has its many issues, but it also has many pluses and ruining its identity so you can build your libertarian dr…

You are confusing localism, self-determination and subsidiary with libertarianism. Read more.

Re: SixCalifornias - initiative to create six states

#54
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> cultural gap between San Francisco and Los Angeles I'm curious as to what you think this gap is.

Ethnic makeup and degree of local homogeniety. Urban density. Use of public transportation. Historical points of interest. Dominant industries. Automobile culture. Access to green space. Consumer habits. Weather patterns. Air quality. Even the color of the surrounding landscape is different. Is it not clear to you that they just "feel" like completely different places, and that different kinds of people live there?

It is not clear to me that the difference between Downtown SF and Downtown LA is bigger than, say, Downtown SF and Hunter's Point.

I mean, take someone from SF and have them live in Stockton for a month, and Fresno for a month, and LA for a month, and see which cultural divide is greatest.

Re: SixCalifornias - initiative to create six states

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe locally—but nationally, it will reduce California’s voice to an infinitesimal one. I have a hunch that this is something that Koch allies and the RNC would love to see, as it would mean that a fairly-reliable blue state (with a lot of EVs) would become two smaller blue states and four red states. This makes even less sense than Prop 13, and will have a substantially worse effect.

(Disclaimer: I'm not American) Doesn't the US system over-represent smaller states? Seems like Californians would have more representatives in DC with these changes. On the second electoral-vote point, it sounds like the proposal would result in more proportional representation of Californians' political opinion which is surely a good thing.

There would be six times as many senators, but presumably the number of representatives wouldn't change that much.

The question might be "a good thing" for whom? American devotion to more proportional representation is and always has been somewhat qualified: the "gerry" in "gerrymander" remembers a signer of the Declaration of Independence...

Re: SixCalifornias - initiative to create six states

#56
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You could do it the way it is done now. Geographically.

What does geography have to do with good government?

Geography has everything to do with government. Where you are geographically determines how you are governed and who governs you.

psuter said, "I find the idea that political and cultural boundaries should align to be a very sad and unimaginative one." Which I took to mean that psuter believes realigning CA along cultural or political boundaries (like saying, "republicans over here, democrats over there") is very sad and unimaginative.

To which you responded "How else could you do it? Tax only the people in favor of infrastructure improvements and prevent everyone else from using them? Only arrest people using recreational drugs if they voted against legalization?"

Which is why I tried to answer your question "How else could you do it?" by pointing out another way it can be done is, you keep things the way they are now meaning, you arrest, tax, and govern everyone equally depending on where they are standing (some things being illegal in some jurisdictions and not in others).

It seems like there's some sort of breakdown in understanding between the two of us here.

Re: SixCalifornias - initiative to create six states

#57
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ethnic makeup and degree of local homogeniety. Urban density. Use of public transportation. Historical points of interest. Dominant industries. Automobile culture. Access to green space. Consumer habits. Weather patterns. Air quality. Even the color of the surrounding landscape is different. Is it not clear to you that they just "feel" like completely different places, and that different kinds of people live there?

It is not clear to me that the difference between Downtown SF and Downtown LA is bigger than, say, Downtown SF and Hunter's Point. I mean, take someone from SF and have them live in Stockton for a month, and Fresno for a month, and LA for a month, and see which cultural divide is greatest.

The point was that the differences within different parts of California are greater than between some cities in different states.

Re: SixCalifornias - initiative to create six states

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You could do it the way it is done now. Geographically.

I'm looking to adverbialize a gerund. Gerrymanderingly? Gerrymandrically? Gerrymanderibly? How it's done now is by politicians counting votes and setting the boundaries for their own benefit. This would be another--more permanent--opportunity for them to do that.

That's really well put. I hadn't thought of it in that way. It seems pretty funny someone would say "What's that? We can't just redraw the districts to get what we want? Fine, let's redraw entire states."

Re: SixCalifornias - initiative to create six states

#59
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(Disclaimer: I'm not American) Doesn't the US system over-represent smaller states? Seems like Californians would have more representatives in DC with these changes. On the second electoral-vote point, it sounds like the proposal would result in more proportional representation of Californians' political opinion which is surely a good thing.

There would be six times as many senators, but presumably the number of representatives wouldn't change that much. The question might be "a good thing" for whom? American devotion to more proportional representation is and always has been somewhat qualified: the "gerry" in "gerrymander" remembers a signer of the Declaration of Independence...

"American devotion to proportional representation"

Well, I didn't believe such a thing existed. :)

Post reply on HN