Earlier quoted context omitted.
http://thinkrf.com/wsa5000/
Building that one was challenging too (I used to do RF work for thinkRF). Going back through history, they started off with something that would only cover a specific band (say wifi, or specific cell bands). Then we did the 0440 (400MHz-4GHz), then the 0108 (10MHz-8GHz). There are all kinds of difficulties that come in to making and RF front-end that'll cover all of that bandwidth (we also did amplification and filte…
HackRF, an open source SDR platform
51–57 of 57 posts
Re: HackRF, an open source SDR platform
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Depends on what you want to do. A lot of people think that they need more bandwidth or power to achieve something. This may not necessarily be the case. QRP guys have crossed continents on less than a watt. I remember from my undergrad days that we've played with band passing the human voice. We managed to get surprisingly good results with 500Hz of bandwidth. There's a lot of interesting things you can do with more…
Most QRP work is at frequencies less than 30MHz. While 6m might work, tropospheric ducting, sporadic E, etc are touchy enough that adding in QRP operation wouldn't be pleasant. The RF upconverter would help with that, however. Power is easily solved by an external amplifier. Increased bandwidth would be nice, but 20MHz is plenty. While you might need that for microwave experiments (wifi, gsm, etc, and spread-spectrum…
Not my experience at all. I have been wallpapering my radio room with 1st place wins as a QRP entrant in the ARRL 10M contest in December for a couple years.
During a Es opening my 5 watts might only be S9+10dB whereas a guy with a 1500 watt linear would be S9+30dB so you can see why its not much of an issue.
Before I got a modest brick for 6M it was the same deal every July and December. I'd have 5 watts out and work guys 1000 miles away who had signals S9+20dB and I'm sure I was "merely" S9 or so on their side.
Another thing is the ops on 6M are gentlemen, by self selection this is not 80M or 20M sideband. They're glad to work a "weak" signal and don't turn down their RF gain or whatever those HF ops do.
When propagation smiles on you, power out doesn't matter. When it doesn't, well you're screwed even if you have illegal levels of power.
I live in a part of the country where the 1000 mile Es donut covers pretty much all the sand states. So I have a lot of Grids! I near got DXCC during just one VHF contest in the spring in just one day!
Re: HackRF, an open source SDR platform
#53So, it's literally a piece of hardware allowing me to take any radio signal from 30MHz to 6GHz, transfer them into digital data and read them out with my Computer? (Or other device)
Re: HackRF, an open source SDR platform
#54I donno if the startup idea is an online course for CS to understand EE or EE to understand CS or both or ... ?
Re: HackRF, an open source SDR platform
#55What cool projects could someone build with this besides scan radio waves?
You could read more about this topic at http://www.arrl.org/
Re: HackRF, an open source SDR platform
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Building that one was challenging too (I used to do RF work for thinkRF). Going back through history, they started off with something that would only cover a specific band (say wifi, or specific cell bands). Then we did the 0440 (400MHz-4GHz), then the 0108 (10MHz-8GHz). There are all kinds of difficulties that come in to making and RF front-end that'll cover all of that bandwidth (we also did amplification and filte…
I wonder how hard it would be to modify PyRF for another SDR?
Re: HackRF, an open source SDR platform
#57Any thoughts on how this could be used as a low cost surveying tool to find sources of WiFi interference? We've been considering getting one of these: http://www.metageek.net/products/wi-spy/ It would be great to instead have a bit of kit that could be repurposed like HackRF.
Caveat: I work on Ubertooth for Michael Ossmann