Earlier quoted context omitted.
> because this purported big Android windfall still fails to appear on any Microsoft quarterly report It shows up under the reporting of the Windows Phone Division: “Windows Phone revenue, reflecting patent licensing revenue and sales of Windows Phone licenses, increased $222 million for the quarter,” http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2011/10/micros... > Given the actual reality that these dollar amounts…
It shows up under the reporting of the Windows Phone Division Windows Phone exists in the entertainment division, which is a division that neither pulls in big numbers, nor actually produces a profit. For the most recent quarter it still lost over $100MM. If these massive Android profits are hidden in there -- in a division that hosts both the xbox and Windows Phone, and has revenue of just two billion a quarter -- t…
Here is just one such an agreement:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/apr/24/zte-android...
Also, from that link, it suggests Microsoft now has 80% of the Android market covered by similar license agreements.
As to the size of those royalty payments, who’s to know. Companies always keep those kind of details under wraps.
But I doubt very much Microsoft is going to go easy on them. Why would they?
And those patents don't only affect Android.
Microsoft recently forced Tom Tom to licence their technology as well.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10206988-56.html
It is no wonder Google is fighting hard against patents.
As the grow Android, Microsoft comes along for free, courtesy of their patent war chest.
Edit: It appears Google owned Motorola is trying to fight these Microsoft patents but they appear to be losing:
http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/04/google-loses-appeal-again...
http://www.fosspatents.com/2012/05/itc-orders-import-ban-aga...