Earlier quoted context omitted.
While boys and girls wore "dresses" till about age 6 or 7, till they were breached[1], they carried gender markers --at least in the upper classes. The clothes were not interchanged. The styles were different and people of the time would be able to identify the gender. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeching_(boys)
Two differences, fwiw: 1. Boys more often had square collars. For example, if you look at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_children_of_Charl... , the girl on the left has a rounded collar, while the boy 2nd-from-left has a squared-off collar. 2. Boys sometimes wore bands ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bands_(neckwear) ). Due to their frequent use of lace they often are perceived as feminine today, but were…
When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink?
51–60 of 81 posts
Re: When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink?
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
My guess is that it was very rare but because of agendas, it'll be played up and mentioned to seem as though it was more common than it actually was. Just me guessing... knowing nothing about the subject.
isn't this a nice example of healthy, unbiased skepticism? lmao. "agendas".
To be credible, a skeptic can't be ignorant.
Re: When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink?
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
>"How old are they?" "When did you have them?" "Are they a boy or a girl?" "They are adorable." Those sentences sound completely normal and grammatical to me.
> Those sentences sound completely normal and grammatical to me. Only if you are talking about more than one person. If you are talking about a single person those sentences sound bizarre.
Look up the "epicene they".
Re: When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink?
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think "they" is preferred over "it", and not rude at all.
When pronoun is unknown, "they" is the common choice. At queer conferences it is becoming the practice to include preferred pronouns on your name tag.
Re: When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink?
#55Never heard that dresses were gender-neutral for small children in the 19th century. Seems I've seen plenty of old photographs that show boys wearing traditionally "masculine" clothing, though commonly with short pants, transitioning to long pants during adolescence.
My guess is that it was very rare but because of agendas, it'll be played up and mentioned to seem as though it was more common than it actually was. Just me guessing... knowing nothing about the subject.
Re: When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink?
#56It is interesting that some social conservatives (or maybe just non-liberals?) care about consciously enforcing gender roles through clothing. This would seem to imply that they are similar in their beliefs with feminists when it comes to the nature/nurture question: that gender is enforced through culture. But this is usually thought of as a very liberal idea (or whatever I should call it). Pink as an effeminate col…
Sorry to be crude, but there is a very non-arbitrary reason for pink to be associated with females (and to a lesser extent, blue with males). In fact I always assumed this was indeed the cause for the association - I'm very surprised to learn it used to be reversed.
Re: When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink?
#57Re: When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink?
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
My guess is that it was very rare but because of agendas, it'll be played up and mentioned to seem as though it was more common than it actually was. Just me guessing... knowing nothing about the subject.
Yes, you don't know. This isn't a matter of opinion or guessing; its a matter of established fact, with lots of written and photographic documentation. As Daniel Patrick Moynihan supposedly said: "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." You add nothing to a rational discussion with nasty slander.
Re: When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink?
#59What has "always" been true usually has very definite origins, sometimes quite recent.
Re: When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink?
#60It's only within the last few Presidential election cycles that the Republicans have become "red" and the Democrats "blue," which is the opposite of what you might expect. What has "always" been true usually has very definite origins, sometimes quite recent.