[deleted]
United States Sentencing Commission website hacked
51–60 of 154 posts
Re: United States Sentencing Commission website hacked
#52It's been a couple of hours since the hack. How does a major gov website not have a plan to act on this quicker? I wonder if they even have an alert letting them know something happened.
Given the small time window for an attack to be viable I have to wonder why a more concise and succinct message wasn't used. It does make me wonder if the bark is bigger than the bite.
Re: United States Sentencing Commission website hacked
#53It's been a couple of hours since the hack. How does a major gov website not have a plan to act on this quicker? I wonder if they even have an alert letting them know something happened.
[deleted]
Re: United States Sentencing Commission website hacked
#54Only tangentially on topic (but more interesting that the actual content of the video I think), but I suspect no warhead reentry shield would actually be shaped as pointy as that. Although you would think a more aerodynamic shape would reduce the drag and therefore heat of reentry, the reality is not quite so simple. In fact, the opposite is actually true. As you make the reentry shield blunter (increasing the drag c…
It has to be pointy! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtahqXjFcxU
Good one! Is it worth watching the whole movie?
Re: United States Sentencing Commission website hacked
#55Dudes. This is not at all helpful. Website defacements just create more of an excuse for a crackdown. If you're going to risk your life and freedom hacking things; make it worth your goddam time. Hack the prison industrial complex and get the evidence that shows that crimes are being created so that prisoners can be kept at a profit. Expose the email trails of corrupt judges who put away kids for kickbacks. Dox the m…
[deleted]
Re: United States Sentencing Commission website hacked
#56The site contains links to 9 encrypted files, one for each of the current Supreme Court Justices. The files are intended to be concatenated into a single file named: Warhead-US-DOJ-LEA-2013.aes256 (US-DOJ-LEA = United States - Department of Justice - Law Enforcement Agency) aes256 is apparently the encryption scheme used to encrypt the files. File names (and sizes): 1115 MB total Scalia.Warhead1 (150 MB) Kennedy.Warh…
https://twitter.com/aestetix/status/295121141805223937
Based on http://66.153.19.162/clarity1.txt through clarity3.txt, it looks like NIH docs.
Re: United States Sentencing Commission website hacked
#57Dudes. This is not at all helpful. Website defacements just create more of an excuse for a crackdown. If you're going to risk your life and freedom hacking things; make it worth your goddam time. Hack the prison industrial complex and get the evidence that shows that crimes are being created so that prisoners can be kept at a profit. Expose the email trails of corrupt judges who put away kids for kickbacks. Dox the m…
Exposing emails, hacking the FBI? This is not at all helpful.
Murdering politicians, assassinating police officers and judges, freeing the wrongly imprisoned by force. A willingness to die fighting. Any or all of those would change things, possibly for the better. But this, this is a waste of your time and ours.
Re: United States Sentencing Commission website hacked
#58Here's the introduction from "Anonymous Operation Last Resort 101"
*1. Welcome to #OpLastResort-TwitterStorm!
You have been selected to assist this important Operation because we're pretty sure you know how to cut and paste. #OpLastResort is a long-term Op devoted to honoring the memory of Aaron Swartz and continuing his important work. Anonymous has prepared content that they would like shared with the world, and it's up to us to make sure it goes everywhere. Other Operatives will be spreading the news to major MSM outlets, YouTube, Facebook, and other websites while you participate in the push to bypass the bias and get the word out directly to the people via Twitter."
(Further details: http://pastebin.com/d2nvt263)
Re: United States Sentencing Commission website hacked
#59Dudes. This is not at all helpful. Website defacements just create more of an excuse for a crackdown. If you're going to risk your life and freedom hacking things; make it worth your goddam time. Hack the prison industrial complex and get the evidence that shows that crimes are being created so that prisoners can be kept at a profit. Expose the email trails of corrupt judges who put away kids for kickbacks. Dox the m…
Exposing emails, hacking the FBI? This is not at all helpful. Murdering politicians, assassinating police officers and judges, freeing the wrongly imprisoned by force. A willingness to die fighting. Any or all of those would change things, possibly for the better. But this, this is a waste of your time and ours.
Can you say martial law?
I know several officers who belong on either side of the integrity fence. Losing the bad ones violently will only turn the good ones against whatever good you're hoping to accomplish.
This is absolutely the worst thing they could do. There are plenty of politicians, police officers and judges who are doing everything they can to free those wrongly imprisoned. Besides that, not everyone who works inside the "machine" is evil; most are just doing their jobs to whatever capacity they can and I assure you, they don't sleep well when their work is used for injustice.
Violence is the worst option. Ask India. They got independence peacefully after violent rebellion failed.
Re: United States Sentencing Commission website hacked
#60The site contains links to 9 encrypted files, one for each of the current Supreme Court Justices. The files are intended to be concatenated into a single file named: Warhead-US-DOJ-LEA-2013.aes256 (US-DOJ-LEA = United States - Department of Justice - Law Enforcement Agency) aes256 is apparently the encryption scheme used to encrypt the files. File names (and sizes): 1115 MB total Scalia.Warhead1 (150 MB) Kennedy.Warh…
There's something strange about those file sizes. If they were a split set, wouldn't they all be the same size except for one?
The only explanation I can think of is the data was `tar`d, then `split`, then compressed (to make the varying sizes), then encrypted, which seems more than a little insane.
The files are Base64 encoded, which means they are considerably larger than their equivalent binary.