What is the main use case for X these days? Is it still as popular as it used to be? Clearly the exodus that happened when Musk took it over didn't kill it but I do seem to see fewer links to it than I used to. Whenever I do see it linked on here it seems to be because one of the big tech CEOs has said something on it.
[flagged]
Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
51–60 of 1001 posts
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#52What is the main use case for X these days? Is it still as popular as it used to be? Clearly the exodus that happened when Musk took it over didn't kill it but I do seem to see fewer links to it than I used to. Whenever I do see it linked on here it seems to be because one of the big tech CEOs has said something on it.
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#53I'm actually much less anti-Musk than the average HN commentator but it should be universally agreed here that a small handful of mega-corp websites dominating the majority of content on the web is a bad thing. Nitter was hardly a solution. Federated platforms like Mastodon and Bluesky are "culturally" closed, and "free speech" platforms like X are "technically" closed.
IMO we all need to start vibe coding PHP bulletin boards again. 'RETVRN' etc.
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's people from all walks of life and all corners of the internet on there still, good and bad. Twitter was always a darned mess, the only difference now is you can't just report people and bully them off the site. Contrast to me trying to open BlueSky, and seeing death threats and other insane things. I've also heard (though never personally seen, nor do I want to) that BlueSky has a CSAM problem. Those two fact…
If you look at the replies to basically any big post, you'll see all the blue checkmark bots in there. Usually just copying posts, sometimes doing a weird ai summary of the original post in a way that isn't actually replying to it. I've got no idea if they're somehow making money off it or what's up
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#55> You've gotta be kidding me. Unfortunately everyone still uses the Nazi app so this is actually a big problem. If the commenter truly believes it’s a Nazi app, why are they the slightest bit upset to lose access to any version of it? It’s astonishingly easy to not use toxic social media platforms.
I can't even read specific public transport updates in my city because they only post those to Twitter, only vague messages on their own website.
We should have prevented Twitter/X and other platforms becoming quasi-official communications channels for public institutions.
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#56In the grand scheme of things I think that this is good.
Its bad, but in the end nobody really cares that much about what is good or bad.
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
I made the mistake of searching it yesterday via a proxy while trying to search for local police news (why do our govts use these mechanisms to publish first) and ran into threads calling for ethnic cleansing of south asians from Texas. Not a great read.
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can want to read something someone else has posted without giving your data to the owner of Twitter.
So, it’s a nazi app that you can’t help but continue to read. I don’t get it.
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#59> You've gotta be kidding me. Unfortunately everyone still uses the Nazi app so this is actually a big problem. If the commenter truly believes it’s a Nazi app, why are they the slightest bit upset to lose access to any version of it? It’s astonishingly easy to not use toxic social media platforms.
I can't even read specific public transport updates in my city because they only post those to Twitter, only vague messages on their own website.