Live data from Hacker News

Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

kagi.com

51–60 of 421 posts

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#51
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Reddit has recently blocked access to old reddit without an account Old Reddit still works just fine without an account.

Maybe for you. I get a nice > Log in to use old Reddit > To keep Reddit safe, accounts are required to access old Reddit. Log in, or continue without an account on reddit.com.

You in the UK?

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#52
post #24
post #3

I've been enjoying Kagi for the last couple years. Even as LLMs slurp up most of the internet and replace search I think Kagi is still useful. Reddit has recently blocked access to old reddit without an account and the ability to filter out stuff like that is useful.

> Reddit has recently blocked access to old reddit without an account Old Reddit still works just fine without an account.

Not for long, sadly.

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#53

This is the kind of feature that would potentially make me switch, but I feel like at this point AI has disrupted web search for me in such a fundamental way that I rarely use a search engine nowadays.

I'm still getting there, but I've seen this. I spent hours a couple days ago trying to get pi, llamacpp, and qwen3.6 working well. I had them working before, but not well. I Googled, and I followed it's instructions and following the links it found. But everything was a partial answer, and nothing was clear.

I finally decided to ask Claude to do it. It discovered things I didn't even know to look for, immediately making it run twice as fast, and then also helped me do the changes I wanted, like per-model settings.

I knew it was settings.json, but I had it in the wrong spot (thanks, Google) and what I didn't realize is that the 2 settings.json files are different. 1 is global-only, and 1 is per-model-only. If you put the wrong settings in, it'll just ignore them silently. Which left me wondering why it didn't work.

Then it tested my settings. Then I had to use the official webpages to set the proper settings and it tested those, too. It made suggestions about removing or changing some settings that also made things work better and faster.

In less than a hour, it had vastly outstripped everything I'd tried, and it got it right and verified it.

And with how wrong I've seen Google's AI be (and how wrong others have said it is) I can't trust it to even bring me the basics about things. It's worse than useless, it's distracting.

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#54
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can still access old.reddit.com from my country/region

It is just people without accounts who are being blocked, and maybe it is regional?

If I could wave a magic wand, I would implement this like some kind of token replenishment or quota system like every IP address gets to access old dot like a very low number and if you log in with the same IP address you get more quota or replenished a little faster if you also come in with no auth like from a private window. Of course, in an ideal world we wouldn't have to do anything like this but yes, regional is likely as well.

I know I worked with some programmers in India and apparently some ISP will do some kind of trickery so like a lot of customers share the same ipv4 address. So what I said above might not actually make sense in the real world.

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#55

Would the biggest impact of this be for things like news sources? I guess the idea is that ads are preferrable, as ads and paywalls seem to be two of the primary existing ways that such places support themselves (or don't)?

Except for maybe some very local stories, almost all news is available on free sites, or will be shortly once the story breaks.

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#56
post #5

Hmmm, so if you are looking for some news item, you'll only find AI-written clickbait articles covered in pop-up ads, rather than any news sites that employ journalists?

Not all news sites are paywalled (reuters for e.g) and if I use a paid search engine like Kagi I'm not looking to experience unwanted advertisement (paywalls are an ad.)

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#57

Killer feature. It would be awesome to have some plugin or userscript to auto-swap the e-begging scammy link for an Archive link instead.

There is the extension Bypass Paywalls Clean[1] which fetches content from archive sites and displays it on the original page.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bypass_Paywalls_Clean

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#58

I would pay for Brave or Kagi for like $2-3 per month if one of them supported private payments(actually that's exactly what Brave costs). Paying should get you more privacy not less. I'm not paying for Kagi because it's expensive and also doesn't support private payments and Brave has better UI for me. Brave blocks their own ads while not supporting private payments and it doesn't let you use the search premium in V…

Not sure what you mean by "private payments" but Kagi accepts Bitcoin: https://help.kagi.com/kagi/plans/payment-methods.html

Monero ideally combined with something like this but one or the other would also be an improvement:

>Brave uses a blind token protocol based on Privacy Pass, which decouples payment identity from service usage. These privacy-preserving subscription credentials allow the browser to verify you have a valid purchase of a premium product (like Origin) without learning anything about you.

https://brave.com/origin/

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#59
I think this is amazing. Love Kagi. I’m happy to pay for a good search.

Nobody speaks about their AI Assistant, but it is really good. They somehow harnessed it so that it mainly searches info first and sticks to the verifiable data. I prefer it to Claude or any other, because it actually answers the question I need without fluff or “Great question! Here’s some plausible nonsense you can trip over instead of doing actual research!”.

Post reply on HN