Meanwhile The Netherlands is bright green due to its suburbanization policies of the 1970s. Let’s spread people out instead of building out our cities…
I don't think what works in a small and flat country with a famously productive agricultural sector can work equally well in the mountains of Spain and Italy.
Half of Europe's towns and villages have fewer residents than 60 years ago
51–60 of 104 posts
Re: Half of Europe's towns and villages have fewer residents than 60 years ago
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
You didn't understand, I was referring to those "depopulated" places as well. So even thought a population of an area decreased prices don't show that.
I take it you've never heard of the 1 euro houses in rural Italy then...?
Re: Half of Europe's towns and villages have fewer residents than 60 years ago
#53Places like Australia have plenty of land but, nah, everyone wants to live urban where housing prices are insane or inherited.
Food costs often go down in developed countries, cheaper than developing ones. Maybe they're so low that they can't afford to become farmers anymore? Not enough people buy corn and corn price is so cheap that it gets made into HFCS. But if you can't mass produce cheap corn, you're screwed and get a desk job.
So we have the service economy. Everyone sells services to one another, works from home, makes tons of money. Madrid has top-tier designers, chefs, doctors, moneylenders, nearly every kind of service. All the piles of money in a concentrated place like Madrid makes the whole place overpriced. If you happen to be the best tuna butcher in Western Europe, there's a limited number of places you can work, but many of these specialist jobs are also wfh.
Is there a hack to this though? Can our top tier Spanish pixel artist sell her services to someone in suburban Canada?
Re: Half of Europe's towns and villages have fewer residents than 60 years ago
#542. Surely "municipality" does not mean the same thing in different countries.
Re: Half of Europe's towns and villages have fewer residents than 60 years ago
#55Europe has been ruined, since USA interfered militarily in Europe. Since 1900, major U.S. military interventions in Europe have included full-scale combat operations during World War I (1917–1918) and World War II (1941–1945), as well as targeted Allied troop deployments in Archangel and Siberia during the Russian Civil War (1918–1920). Throughout the Cold War, U.S. forces executed non-combat and advisory operations,…
Re: Half of Europe's towns and villages have fewer residents than 60 years ago
#56Re: Half of Europe's towns and villages have fewer residents than 60 years ago
#57Some countries have really high housing prices and housing scarcity right on a border with another country where this isn't the case. You can get 30-40% differences just by moving a few km on the borders of the Netherlands. The reason this isn't that popular is that by moving like that you get to deal with different jurisdictions and tax systems. Particularly the social systems different countries have are very diffe…
> A two hour commute is much less of a problem if you can be a bit productive. A two hour commute sounds absolutely unbearable to my ears. I guess it makes sense if you are able work for 4 hours daily inside a train or something, but that's already half of the workday, i.e. you might as well just work from home.
Re: Half of Europe's towns and villages have fewer residents than 60 years ago
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A two hour commute is much less of a problem if you can be a bit productive. A two hour commute sounds absolutely unbearable to my ears. I guess it makes sense if you are able work for 4 hours daily inside a train or something, but that's already half of the workday, i.e. you might as well just work from home.
If you could reliably work from your autonomous vehicle for two hours you might be able to include that as part of your work day, e.g. 2 hours working on the ride in, 4 hours in the office, 2 hours on the ride home for the full 8 hours. If not, you could fall asleep in the backseat, watch some TV shows, or... you know. Just make sure your windows are tinted. In any case, I'd definitely take a 2 hour "do whatever in t…
Re: Half of Europe's towns and villages have fewer residents than 60 years ago
#59People move to where they can make a living. Globalization has largely killed farming as a viable livelihood (in most of the EU at least), it's simply not profitable enough unless you have a massive amount of land/cattle or have invested heavily in automation (usually both). Without that important sector, it's doubtful the trend will reverse unless cities become literally unlivable or there's some kind of miracle in…
Re: Half of Europe's towns and villages have fewer residents than 60 years ago
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
You didn't understand, I was referring to those "depopulated" places as well. So even thought a population of an area decreased prices don't show that.
I take it you've never heard of the 1 euro houses in rural Italy then...?