Live data from Hacker News

Commodification of Intelligence: Good, Bad, and Ugly Circular AI Deals

emergingtrajectories.com

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: Commodification of Intelligence: Good, Bad, and Ugly Circular AI Deals

#51
post #18

Has a competent economist modeled the circularity of these deals ? [ numerically or analytically ] It seems a healthy economy has a lot of wide circularity .. money circulating is a good thing, a result of a functioning market, tracking the flow of real goods / services. But large corps circulating paper 'self-deals' or debt-swaps seems like a bad thing - a creative accounting practice designed to pump up their stock…

The leverage is the trick in the whole equation. During dotcom days the leverage was fine until the cash flow ran out. Then bankruptcies started and the bottom fell out. It appears this is happening again but perhaps the business model will just evolve. Although right now it feels more of the same.

Re: Commodification of Intelligence: Good, Bad, and Ugly Circular AI Deals

#52
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good point. Do you think the NASDAQ selloff will recover once Korea stabilizes?

Eventually. I'm a bit concerned about it right now. I think SpaceX showed that the AI story is weaker than promoted. This will make people wonder about all the money going into it. If the bubble pops, the blow back on that particular index will be huge. Maybe dotcom bursting huge. But after 15 years QQQ move positive.

SpaceX mainly showed how corrupt securities regulation has become in the US. It was already quite corrupt, but there's no way that IPO would have flown under the Biden administration.
Post reply on HN