Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Codeberg: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions

codeberg.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 80 posts

Re: Codeberg: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions

#51

Post by viraptor »

inigyou wrote: post #47
viraptor wrote: post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really want to, as soon as someone actually implements auth federation in a large system. Forgejo is making some steps, but... It's hard to self-host without making contributions really annoying. For self hosting, you're either large enough for people to go where you are regardless of the system, or you're effectively giving up the changes of having a community.

How about accepting bug reports and patches by email? You could make this an experiment and tell us how it went.

I can already tell you - my email has always been out there. Over the last 2+ decades, I received 0 patches and 1 bug report across everything I released. And I really don't want to deal with a patch attachment. So no, I wouldn't say that's the way.

Re: Codeberg: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions

#52

Post by surgical_fire »

f311a wrote: post #43

I think at this point any attempt to prevent it will fail. AI code is almost everywhere, even in projects that were against it 6 months ago.

This is not about preventing anything.

It's on their Terms of Use. If you violate it, they will delete your account.

Re: Codeberg: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions

#53

Post by inigyou »

viraptor wrote: post #51
inigyou wrote: post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How about accepting bug reports and patches by email? You could make this an experiment and tell us how it went.

I can already tell you - my email has always been out there. Over the last 2+ decades, I received 0 patches and 1 bug report across everything I released. And I really don't want to deal with a patch attachment. So no, I wouldn't say that's the way.

How many did you receive on other channels?

Re: Codeberg: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions

#54

Post by viraptor »

inigyou wrote: post #53
viraptor wrote: post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can already tell you - my email has always been out there. Over the last 2+ decades, I received 0 patches and 1 bug report across everything I released. And I really don't want to deal with a patch attachment. So no, I wouldn't say that's the way.

How many did you receive on other channels?

Lots.

Re: Codeberg: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions

#56

Post by inigyou »

onesandofgrain wrote: post #11

Codeberg is just a nice logo wrapped around Forgejo/Gitea. I don't really see the appeal besides free hosting + some storage. People should either self-host a gitea/forgejo/gogs server for like 3$ a month on hetzner or just use gitea.com. If you want to share your repos, just use sharemygit.com and spread the repo on coding forums. Personally I find this a much better stimulant for a community, then just having free-…

Well that's the point isn't it? It's free and it's someone else's problem. That's what people actually want in reality. They don't want to be sysadmins.

Re: Codeberg: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions

#57

Post by inigyou »

brabel wrote: post #25
vrganj wrote: post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> So the quality of AI code will absolutely surpass that of human code. This is unfounded speculation, presented as inevitable fact.

Seems pretty inevitable to me. I already don’t trust myself to write code without it being reviewed by AI . It always finds something wrong!

Nobody here is complaining about using an LLM as a linter.

Some may have concerns about energy use. But that's not Codeberg's problem.

Re: Codeberg: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions

#59

Post by jaggs »

lelanthran wrote: post #24
jaggs wrote: post #2

This is a bit strange. Are they saying that Codeberg no longer accepts vibe coded projects at all? If so, it seems kind of short sighted. Within a very short period of time all code will be AI code. What then? And as the models improve, along with better code will come better bug fixing etc etc. So the quality of AI code will absolutely surpass that of human code. What then? Will the repositories demand proof of prog…

> If so, it seems kind of short sighted. Within a very short period of time all code will be AI code. What then? Then you'll use one of the many, many providers who will host your code. Why is it so important to you that this specific provider has to host vibe-coded stuff when you can host it anywhere else? Is "rest of the world" not a big enough place for you?

Mainly ethical, EU and open source reasons.

Re: Codeberg: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions

#60

Post by jaggs »

archargelod wrote: post #16
jaggs wrote: post #2

This is a bit strange. Are they saying that Codeberg no longer accepts vibe coded projects at all? If so, it seems kind of short sighted. Within a very short period of time all code will be AI code. What then? And as the models improve, along with better code will come better bug fixing etc etc. So the quality of AI code will absolutely surpass that of human code. What then? Will the repositories demand proof of prog…

> What then? Then all digital systems will be compromised and our civilization will collapse. Without internet and computers, we would all be living happy farmer lives.

Joy.
Post reply on HN