Live data from Hacker News

GTX 1080s: Testing a Legend

lttlabs.com

51–57 of 57 posts

Re: GTX 1080s: Testing a Legend

#51
post #22

What's legendary about the 1080? It's a smaller 980ti on a much smaller node.

Less energy usage, more vram, faster in games (see https://www.pc-kombo.com/us/benchmark/games/gpu/compare?ids%... ). But it is even more about timing. Nvidia shifted to RTX afterwards, opting to go for raytracing and upscaling instead of making strictly faster cards. Which made the last GTX cards very competitive for regular usage, raising its status.

It's the same architecture of the 980 on a smaller node, that's it.

It's not considered a legendary card by the industry.

Re: GTX 1080s: Testing a Legend

#53

the legendary Core i7-8700K This might be a unique assessment. My perspective is that Intel's strong lines were 4th gen and then 12th gen. I see a number 4770 and 4790 still doing the job they were bought for. I expect the same for 12th gen when they're 13yo. Not so for anything between 4th and 12th.

I have i5-8600k OC to 5GHz and it's still decent.

Re: GTX 1080s: Testing a Legend

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> so I think it's time for an upgrade, what do you recommend? Without knowing what you'll use it for, probably a 9970x + RTX Pro 6000 would do the trick, YMMV.

I don't know about you, but most of us don't want to drop $10k+ on a GPU!

Well, no one knows about anyone because no one is sharing what they want to use the hardware for! Kind of hard to give recommendations then :)

Re: GTX 1080s: Testing a Legend

#55
post #23

I have 3 3090s, all in various gaming computers. I’m not sure what to do with them- the VRAM is only 24GB so doesn’t seem worth the power costs to run an open weight model. Any suggestions on how I can run them as some type of cluster? Is it worth exploring NVLink?

As others said, you can run more than one at a time, but even singly, 24 GB can be very useful in a hybrid approach. For instance, I recently had to process hundreds of high-res blueprints. Used Fable for the main orchestration, but all of the OCR and other work I did with a small local model. Didn't waste expensive Fable tokens on simple grunt work.

What are you using for OCR locally? This is something I've been considering trying for some time with old journals.

Re: GTX 1080s: Testing a Legend

#56
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The RAM crunch has been a quiet victory for those older cards. I have a 10 year old video card in my rig that had at the time a decent but not chart topping 8GB of RAM. Developers are still targeting 8GB because so many of the cards released today still have that. Since I'm still using 1080p the performance is usually acceptable too. Surprisingly the biggest problem is becoming the CPU, with the i5-3570k lacking a fe…

SSE or AVX?

The cutoff is AVX2 instructions. They were introduced one generation later.

Re: GTX 1080s: Testing a Legend

#57
post #16

Funny enough, I have the 1080 and I tested qwen 3.5 9b on it today. I was positively surprised with the experience. It's no Opus but it did OK on the couple of queries and tasks I gave it. It's pretty impressive for a 10 year old gpu!

If it had more vram it could really cook. Qwen3.6-35b-a3b quantized to 3bits is genuinely usable for coding running on the ten year old pascal card with 16gb i picked up recently.
Post reply on HN