Societal Impacts: Claude's values across models and languages

Post by throw1234567891 » Wed, Jul 15, 2026, 5:44 PM UTC

embedding-shape wrote: post #50

throw1234567891 wrote: post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but the hammer doesn’t generate hits based on an algorithm. You hold the hammer, if you hit yourself with it, why do you call it stupid? I bet you don’t call the hammer stupid when someone else hits you with it.

Have you never used tools, been hurt by how you used them, know you are responsible yet take out your pain on the tool, verbally or otherwise? Feels like I'm having a conversation with a robot who hasn't experienced emotions or the very least never used physical tools.

Post by mdp2021 » Thu, Jul 16, 2026, 6:59 AM UTC

semiquaver wrote: post #43

mdp2021 wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the second level of the implementation of unintelligence. The first was when they most obviously acritically repeated what they heard, "hearsay machines", "stochastic parrots". Intelligence requires assessment over every provisional output - a continuous cycle of criticisms over intuition. The second is proposing doctrinal biases, again without verification of the content - "hysterical reactive machines".

> Intelligence requires assessment over every provisional output - a continuous cycle of criticisms over intuition It’s not clear what you’re saying. Most humans don’t think this way, would you say they do not possess “intelligence”?

Post by MSKJ » Thu, Jul 16, 2026, 10:33 PM UTC

gibspaulding wrote: post #20

logicalappeals wrote: post #2

Is it just me or has Claude become kind of judgmental nowadays? I feel like it’s constantly trying to lecture me about things that have no relevance to the conversation at hand. Recently, I was shocked when it ended a chat sessions of its own accord after I used a word it did not like 3 times. It told me something to the effect of “This is the third time I’ve told you not to use that word, I’m ending this conversatio…

I think this is a really interesting difference between Anthropic and Open AI’s models and points to why people seem so split on which model they prefer. GPT seems to be designed more as a tool. If you want your agent to do what you say without questions and without having its own ideas and agendas you’ll likely prefer it. Claude on the other hand feels more like an attempt at creating a digital person. If you want a…