Google Search lets creators know more about their reach

Post by tough » Sun, Jul 12, 2026, 1:24 AM UTC

Barbing wrote: post #49

shevy-java wrote: post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hopefully that is the case, because what Google and others are trying via AI, is to privatize the web. They already tried it via AMP. People are probably annoyed that AI/LLMs are lying to them, so not everyone sees the main threat being Google trying to containerize and "walled garden" approach access to information. > I have certainly found that when I ask a chat tool something, and then go to the human-written sour…

Which lab is going to stop AI from hallucinating first? What’s taking them so long? If OpenAI was going to do it, why didn’t Anthropic do it first, or vice versa? Or if we assume collusion: shouldn’t DeepSeek have released a hallucination-free LLM to steal the US’s thunder? (Good points on AMP and walled garden)

Post by Barbing » Mon, Jul 13, 2026, 8:43 AM UTC

tough wrote: post #51

Barbing wrote: post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which lab is going to stop AI from hallucinating first? What’s taking them so long? If OpenAI was going to do it, why didn’t Anthropic do it first, or vice versa? Or if we assume collusion: shouldn’t DeepSeek have released a hallucination-free LLM to steal the US’s thunder? (Good points on AMP and walled garden)

the whole point of an llm is to generate "plausible sounding" tokens one after each other. It can sadly not hold any concept of truth or reality as we humans understand it