Maybe that's what Jesus used on the people that he healed
In the whole Christian tradition, God/Jesus generally does not go for organ or limb regeneration. Two counter examples are a healed ear in Luke (but this may well have been resumption of hearing? details are a little light), and then a single Spanish example in the 1600s. For His own mysterious reasons, He simply doesn’t go in for that stuff, however much intercessionary prayer ends up in His inbox.
The ability to regrow body parts is dormant in mammals, not lost
51–60 of 75 posts
Re: The ability to regrow body parts is dormant in mammals, not lost
#52Re: The ability to regrow body parts is dormant in mammals, not lost
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
2 years I ago I sliced maybe 1.5mm frommy thumb-tip; when taking off the bandage, I could clearly see the "straight cut" and that some material was missing. Until today, it recovered completely
What, last night?
Is this sentence better?
Re: The ability to regrow body parts is dormant in mammals, not lost
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lol, I once sharpened my knives and went to cook. During the prep I said, "wow I wonder how sharp the knife is", next thing you know, i cut about 1/4" of my finger tip off, right through the finger nail with zero resistance. Besides the blood getting everywhere and needing superglue to stop it, it grew back completely fine.
You shouldn't really sharpen kitchen knifes too sharp. And even if they're not super razor sharp (cutting a finger with no resistance), you should still warn people new to your kitchen or even family members/regular users right after each re-sharpening. Additionally, too low angle will make the knife very suspectible to blunting and/or require constant drawing on the sharpening steel¹. Unless you have super high qual…
There is a sentence among cooks: "only with a stub/butt knife you cut yourself" - isnt this true anymore?
Re: The ability to regrow body parts is dormant in mammals, not lost
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
I take from this that you don't, otherwise you would explain it
You're the one who believes magic is real, it's up to you to explain it. Extraordinary claims and such.
Re: The ability to regrow body parts is dormant in mammals, not lost
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
No I don't because I'm not claiming that I know that it happened
What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. There was no Jesus who performed miracles of healing
What’s your evidence for this claim?
Re: The ability to regrow body parts is dormant in mammals, not lost
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Jesus, if he existed, didn't actually heal anyone or perform any miracles. That's mythology, not reality.
How do you know?
a 4 word summary of the entire works of every religion in the world, ever -- the original Pascal's Wager flavored FOMO social networking maneuver.
Re: The ability to regrow body parts is dormant in mammals, not lost
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
What, last night?
haha :D Sorry,English is not my native language! What I meant was: "During the last years until today" Is this sentence better?
“Until today” is one of those English phrases that is particularly unfair on non-native speakers. You know “until” and you know “today” and so it’s completely natural to combine them in the way you did.
But as ever, English is dumb and annoying and hard work, all at the same time.
Re: The ability to regrow body parts is dormant in mammals, not lost
#59It's just hidden by a feature flag. (Probably for a good reason)
Re: The ability to regrow body parts is dormant in mammals, not lost
#60Retina is a good example of this. Zebrafish can regrow damaged retina, but while mammals have the same stem cells (Muller glia), they dont repair the retina, but form scar tissue. There is a lot of research and I think they have managed to modify rat genome, so that their retina has showns some repair abilities. The problem is that it often causes tumors. I have other retina permanently damaged, and suffer from doubl…
Ah, I was wondering the evolutionary reason why those genes would have gone dormant. Cancer is a sensible answer.