Live data from Hacker News

Why are cells small?

burrito.bio

51–60 of 86 posts

Re: Why are cells small?

#51
post #7

Nitpick maybe, but I don't think oocytes are the largest cells, it pretty much has to be some sort of neuron. A sensory neuron for eg. someplace in the foot will be almost as long as the person is tall, and even if the neuron is extremely thin, it's gotta beat the oocyte for volume.

But neurons are electrical no? I suppose maybe that's why they're not in the comparison.

Or does that work with diffusion too?

Re: Why are cells small?

#52
post #8
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know for sure here, but isn't the ostrich IN the egg a multicellular animal? I would assume the first point where the egg contains anything that will become the ostrich, mitosis is happening to make more ostrich cells. I'm assuming there's always cell walls and nucleuses every step of the way here, and the egg and ostrich are never just one big cell. I could be off base here though, I'm really channeling grad…

You're correct, but only for fertilized eggs. Unfertilized eggs are single cells.

Surrounded by a bunch of stuff that isn’t the ovum. “There is at most one cell in an unfertilized bird egg” is not the same as “an unfertilized bird egg is one cell and nothing more”.

Re: Why are cells small?

#53
Perhaps cells are small in the first place is for efficiency. It's more efficient to perform a set of tasks with trillions of these cells in unison than one big blob.

Re: Why are cells small?

#54
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Cell sizes are not fixed, however, even within a single species. Cells often swell as they increase their production of proteins and metabolites in preparation for division. This is in line with biology’s only rule: namely, there are exceptions to every rule! > Case in point: a giant bacterium called Thiomargarita magnifica can extend about one centimeter in length, so large that it can be seen by the naked eye. It…

Interesting topology. How empty is the vacuole?

empty in terms of normal cell components, apparently it stores relatively huge amounts of nitrates that are a necessary energy source for it

Re: Why are cells small?

#55
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I never bought into the egg thing. There’s clearly a distinct cell in the center that’s going to divide and grow inside the egg. The egg itself isn’t undergoing mitosis.

One of the fascinating things about biology I think is this - that if the cells of your body were the size of an egg, they'd be way, way too big and you'd probably die.

I also find it interesting that if your spleen were to go prompt critical, it would irradiate you and you'd probably die. That is my favorite fact about nuclear physics.

Re: Why are cells small?

#56
post #2

Not all are? Largest eukaryote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valonia_ventricosa largest prokaryote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiomargarita_namibiensis

These both feature large central vacuoles, lending support the thesis of the article that the cubic growth in volume outstrips the quadratic increase in surface area for transferring nutrients and waste across the cell membrane.

Re: Why are cells small?

#58
Aside from the anthropocentric view that cells are relatively small because we are made of many of them, the increases in size of lifeforms past that of individual cells is a matter of exceeding thermodynamic and informational limits. I highly recommend the book _The Vital Question_ as an intro to the systemic view of this kind of biological complexification
Post reply on HN