Live data from Hacker News

Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series

gateworld.net

51–60 of 82 posts

Re: Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series

#51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Joseph Mallozzi says it's not, and he was involved with the new series development. I suppose Amazon is making enough from the concept that they aren't interested in selling it.

How would they make anything from it if they aren't going to make the show?

Possibly it continues to stream frequently enough to be considered a contributor to Prime Video? Not sure if you can stream it other places, but if so, those fees would be continued revenue that might disappear if the reaction to a new show is poor.

Re: Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series

#53
post #44
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The new Expanse was good though.

Sad they didn’t finish it. The later books seemed like they were written “to be movies/series” with less political stuff and more visuals / speculative sci-fi. Plus the story has an actual half decent conclusion. To me the plight of Hollywood is “forever shows” where the writers start without knowing where it would end, so shows never really “end” they just slowly fizzle out without ever getting to the end. I simply…

I'm currently reading the first book that takes place after the conclusion of the show. There's a large time jump and I suspect they didn't want to age up the actors for 3 seasons.

Re: Amazon Has Axed Its New Stargate Series

#54
post #32

Amazon? I'm sure Macgyver would've had to be a woman. And make her gay.

Oh no, a sci-fi series making a character a woman? Like that famous train wreck Battlestar Galactica?

Who cares about Starbuck's gender swap when you have Number Six?

I suppose if you make O'Neill a woman, you could bring in Vala earlier in the series as a similar distraction

Post reply on HN