AI will never convince a jury though.
AI outperforms law professors in Stanford Law study
51–60 of 384 posts
Re: AI outperforms law professors in Stanford Law study
#52[flagged]
You're suspicious that the person doing academic research on how AI applies to law has a job related to research on law and AI?
Re: AI outperforms law professors in Stanford Law study
#53I think there will be a market for firms that aggressively market themselves as non-AI, and then as more people turn towards that human connection we'll go full circle
that worked out for artists and translators right ?
Re: AI outperforms law professors in Stanford Law study
#54Marc Andreessen argued that we've already reached AGI. He says that the top AI models give better answers than 99% of people he has access to, and he has access to some of the best people in their field. I'm getting more convinced. I mean, sure it makes dumb mistakes sometimes but its a particular set of self serving mistakes, commenting out tests in order to pass. We obv don't want this behavior but I wouldn't say i…
> Marc Andreessen argued that we've already reached AGI. He says that the top AI models give better answers than 99% of people he has access to, and he has access to some of the best people in their field.
Investor with vested interest in AI companies makes claim of reaching "AGI".
He is one of the last people to listen to about AGI. Unless the term "AGI" means something entirely different to him vs to independent researchers vs to CEOs, since the term has become entirely meaningless.
Re: AI outperforms law professors in Stanford Law study
#55Personally I think this is very good. One of the hardest things out there is maintaining a society in the face of changing times and it's because law is dense and slow. I think, in the right hands, this could be huge.
It turns out everybody has at least one right hand, even the people we trust the least.
Re: AI outperforms law professors in Stanford Law study
#56Incredible that the common people will be able to wrestle the right to rule of law away from the bloated legal caste, who have built themselves quite the moat.
The inaccessibility of justice is a huge driver of inequality. Any tools which bridge this gap will help make a more just society.
Re: AI outperforms law professors in Stanford Law study
#57Marc Andreessen argued that we've already reached AGI. He says that the top AI models give better answers than 99% of people he has access to, and he has access to some of the best people in their field. I'm getting more convinced. I mean, sure it makes dumb mistakes sometimes but its a particular set of self serving mistakes, commenting out tests in order to pass. We obv don't want this behavior but I wouldn't say i…
[flagged]
I’m not an AI stan by any means and certainly no fan of Andreessen, but using the term “clanker” immediately biases your statement and can discredit what is a well-referenced or well-meaning comment.
Re: AI outperforms law professors in Stanford Law study
#58Marc Andreessen argued that we've already reached AGI. He says that the top AI models give better answers than 99% of people he has access to, and he has access to some of the best people in their field. I'm getting more convinced. I mean, sure it makes dumb mistakes sometimes but its a particular set of self serving mistakes, commenting out tests in order to pass. We obv don't want this behavior but I wouldn't say i…
He would tell you NFTs were AGIs if it might get you to buy them.
Re: AI outperforms law professors in Stanford Law study
#59Marc Andreessen argued that we've already reached AGI. He says that the top AI models give better answers than 99% of people he has access to, and he has access to some of the best people in their field. I'm getting more convinced. I mean, sure it makes dumb mistakes sometimes but its a particular set of self serving mistakes, commenting out tests in order to pass. We obv don't want this behavior but I wouldn't say i…
Marc Andreessen has a strong financial incentive to feel this way and to convince others to feel this way.
I also think it’s easy to think that AI gives good answers if you don’t know the field well. In fields where I know the material, the answers are pretty variable and can be quite bad.
Re: AI outperforms law professors in Stanford Law study
#60AI will never convince a jury though.
A couple of acting classes might be cheaper than a lawyer, then you can go all out representing yourself.