Live data from Hacker News

YC's Biggest Scandals

ycombinator.fyi

51–60 of 102 posts

Re: YC's Biggest Scandals

#53
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably the worry that the jump from "we defend against slaughterbots" to "we built a better slaughterbot" is just around the corner

... so don't defend against the slaughterbots? (I don't know anything about the company we're discussing here, but this is a weird premise.)

That means 18 year olds will get splattered. I'm not for that. The kids who die in the military are just kids, regardless of their job. They aren't personally responsible for the shit orders they get.

The problem is that anything made for defense is almost inherently useful for offense, and the US is not the most trustworthy government right now. It's, sadly, not inconceivable that an automatic turret mounted shotgun could be put to use against human people across the globe, or even human people who are citizens of the US.

Re: YC's Biggest Scandals

#54
Cool idea, but totally botched by making LLMs generate the descriptions. I feel defrauded for my time. Might as well put ycombinator.fyi on ycombinator.fyi.

Re: YC's Biggest Scandals

#55
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A company named 9 mothers, which sells a service to stop artificially intelligent machines from falling from sky and blowing up everything… funded by another company that lures smart young men and women with billionaire dreams that wreak havoc on society. Not dystopian at all.

I mean killer drones are absolutely dystopian but they already exist. This critique is like the common Bay Area tactic of pretending homeless don't exist because they are inconvenient. There is tons of offensive capability companies YC has invested in they seem like a more appropriate target. I feel like most people want there to be protection from drone swarms.

Yeah, but the whole thing is still dystopian. If there was a company A planting mind controlling chips in your mind, and company B selling a service to destroy those chips… neither company makes the whole thing less dystopian.

Re: YC's Biggest Scandals

#56
post #17

LLM-designed sites like this are always so pompous. The obnoxious format does a disservice to what you’re trying to present.

Sometimes I will see a domain on YC and immediately know it will be LLM-designed before clicking on the link. This was one of those projects. Wish they were more human and more understated.

LLM designed webpages are fine. But they're just that. Fine.

They're bland and average. Almost like they are designed by a system inherently selecting the average over time.

I like people made pages better because there's generally a little more flavor of the designer. Unless it's like a wiki where I'm just digesting information, I'm looking for a little personal touch. Otherwise, what's the point? If the author or designer can't be bothered to actually put work in to the project, why should I put work into consuming it?

Re: YC's Biggest Scandals

#57
post #32
post #23

YC has funded over 5000 companies, and this page catalogs 39 that failed, many of which, on the sites own terms, are simply business failures, with no additional drama. I don't think the authors of the site realize the case they're actually making here.

There's something ironic about vibe-coding an anti-YC site. They're why OpenAI exists!

OpenAI has their own fair share of critiques, I'd be careful lifting them up as a shining example.

Re: YC's Biggest Scandals

#58
post #23

YC has funded over 5000 companies, and this page catalogs 39 that failed, many of which, on the sites own terms, are simply business failures, with no additional drama. I don't think the authors of the site realize the case they're actually making here.

Which is why these critical pieces are important, so that this proportion doesn't increase. YC should stand these criticisms lest it become a religion of sorts.

Re: YC's Biggest Scandals

#59
post #23

YC has funded over 5000 companies, and this page catalogs 39 that failed, many of which, on the sites own terms, are simply business failures, with no additional drama. I don't think the authors of the site realize the case they're actually making here.

[deleted]

Re: YC's Biggest Scandals

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A company named 9 mothers, which sells a service to stop artificially intelligent machines from falling from sky and blowing up everything… funded by another company that lures smart young men and women with billionaire dreams that wreak havoc on society. Not dystopian at all.

It sounds like you feel that autonomous killer drones are a dystopia, and that anything related to the drones -- including mitigating their effect -- is therefore dystopian in itself, even if it is combating that dystopia? Sort of a tarring by contextual environment? I suppose by that reasoning a socialist is a capitalist because even though they fight capitalism they live in a capitalist society. I'm not really foll…

“It sounds like you feel that autonomous killer drones are a dystopia, and that anything related to the drones“

Yes!!! What do you think a dystopia is? The entire world of 1984 is a dystopia. Just cause there’s a company making money to “combat” that dystopia doesn’t make the thing any less dystopian.

Post reply on HN