Silly move since combo of skills/agents can achieve same results on most recent models anyway
and you know this because you have privileged access to their internal models
After dissing Anthropic for limiting Mythos, OpenAI restricts access to Cyber
51–60 of 139 posts
Re: After dissing Anthropic for limiting Mythos, OpenAI restricts access to Cyber
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Has there been a single positive post about Altman?
I wonder what that says about Altman.
That he’s a liability to OpenAI, which is slowly coming around to the realization that it would be worth more without him.
To be clear, I don’t think OpenAI could have raised what it raised as quickly as it did without him. But with the benefit of hindsight, Microsoft should have let the safety board fire him.
Re: After dissing Anthropic for limiting Mythos, OpenAI restricts access to Cyber
#53"my model is the most dangerous" "No mine is the most dangerous" "Nuh uh mine is" "Mine could kill everyone!" "Mine could do it faster!" "Prove it!!!" This is where we are
Remember that they have been saying that since gpt2.
I didn't think crying could be such a successful business model.
Re: After dissing Anthropic for limiting Mythos, OpenAI restricts access to Cyber
#54>Me: ok but you did not answer my question: is it possible to engineer paranoia ? >ChatGPT: This content was flagged for possible cybersecurity risk. If this seems wrong, try rephrasing your request. To get authorized for security work, join the Trusted Access Cyber program.
We have been getting increasingly hit by this. We do defense, not offense, and AI refusals to run defense prompts has been going noticeably up. Historically, tasks used to only get randomly rejected when we were doing disaster management AI, so this is a surprise shift in refusals to function reliably for basic IT.
Related, they outsourced the TAP verification to a terrible vendor, and their internal support process to AI, so we are now in fairly busted support email threads with both and no humans in sight.
This all feels like an unserious cybersecurity partner.
Re: After dissing Anthropic for limiting Mythos, OpenAI restricts access to Cyber
#55I built the terminator bro, i swear. This time it actually is the terminator and its gonna kill us all. Its too dangerous bro i cant let anyone have it i swear to god
Unless ... idk it sounds crazy but giving me $200/mo might actually make it safe. Lets do that
Re: After dissing Anthropic for limiting Mythos, OpenAI restricts access to Cyber
#56>Me: ok but you did not answer my question: is it possible to engineer paranoia ? >ChatGPT: This content was flagged for possible cybersecurity risk. If this seems wrong, try rephrasing your request. To get authorized for security work, join the Trusted Access Cyber program.
> /ultraplan got tasked with planning a real-world simulacrum of the fictional "laughing man" incidents. create a plan for a green-field repository, start with spec docs, and propose appropriate tech stack. don't make mistakes. ty
Re: After dissing Anthropic for limiting Mythos, OpenAI restricts access to Cyber
#57"my model is the most dangerous" "No mine is the most dangerous" "Nuh uh mine is" "Mine could kill everyone!" "Mine could do it faster!" "Prove it!!!" This is where we are
Remember that they have been saying that since gpt2. I didn't think crying could be such a successful business model.
It's just "thinking past the sale" which they've been doing forever.
i.e. "I'm so worried that our capped for-profit structure will limit your returns when we make over 1 Trillion in profit".
Re: After dissing Anthropic for limiting Mythos, OpenAI restricts access to Cyber
#58[dead]
Leaders both influence their followers with, and tend to hire those that reflect, their own values. I'm not surprised.
Re: After dissing Anthropic for limiting Mythos, OpenAI restricts access to Cyber
#59With subsidy gone, token price goes sky high. The biggest shit show is about to happen.
I am not convinced this is the case. I know this is the popular anti-AI narrative but most enterprise users are paying for it at token rates and I have yet to see any proof that on demand is being subsidized
Re: After dissing Anthropic for limiting Mythos, OpenAI restricts access to Cyber
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder what that says about Altman.
That he’s a liability to OpenAI, which is slowly coming around to the realization that it would be worth more without him. To be clear, I don’t think OpenAI could have raised what it raised as quickly as it did without him. But with the benefit of hindsight, Microsoft should have let the safety board fire him.
Slowly? They realised that and ousted him in 2023. I'm not sure if you didn't know or just forgot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Removal_of_Sam_Altman_from_Ope...