Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey

theargumentmag.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 284 posts

Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey

#51

Post by [deleted] »

phalangion wrote: post #48
rdevilla wrote: post #41

The joke's on you all for willingly posting this content online for it to later be harvested by AI. Nobody is forcing you to use these systems. The hackers have always said this moment, or something like it, would come, from beneath their canopies of tin foil. I've posted almost nothing online - not under pseudonyms nor real names - for over a decade. I sat on this HN username for almost 12 years before making a sing…

How do you propose a journalist work without posting their writing online?

[deleted]

Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey

#52

Post by [deleted] »

phalangion wrote: post #48
rdevilla wrote: post #41

The joke's on you all for willingly posting this content online for it to later be harvested by AI. Nobody is forcing you to use these systems. The hackers have always said this moment, or something like it, would come, from beneath their canopies of tin foil. I've posted almost nothing online - not under pseudonyms nor real names - for over a decade. I sat on this HN username for almost 12 years before making a sing…

How do you propose a journalist work without posting their writing online?

[deleted]

Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey

#53

Post by arjie »

Man, the day we get Satoshi Nakomoto out will be the day we must bow to our privacy destroying overlords. For the moment, they can’t tell me from my posts: unknown rando that I am.

Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey

#54

Post by coalstartprob »

oceanplexian wrote: post #34

> That includes gay people like me, who could hardly have admitted under our names to how we lived our lives for most of America’s history, as well as many other groups with minoritarian lifestyles While the points made are completely valid I want to point out that the statement of "Hey, by the way, first let me talk about my sexuality" lowers the quality of dialog a significant degree. 31 million people in America a…

[dead]

Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey

#55

Post by coalstartprob »

ngriffiths wrote: post #49
oceanplexian wrote: post #34

> That includes gay people like me, who could hardly have admitted under our names to how we lived our lives for most of America’s history, as well as many other groups with minoritarian lifestyles While the points made are completely valid I want to point out that the statement of "Hey, by the way, first let me talk about my sexuality" lowers the quality of dialog a significant degree. 31 million people in America a…

Isn't the super dramatic shift in public opinion on this topic the exact thing that makes it such a good example? Isn't the point that anonymity is not considered a universal right yet it is obviously a good thing once considering this example and others? This is a super weird and wrong way to read it.

[dead]

Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey

#56

Post by Retr0id »

rdevilla wrote: post #41

The joke's on you all for willingly posting this content online for it to later be harvested by AI. Nobody is forcing you to use these systems. The hackers have always said this moment, or something like it, would come, from beneath their canopies of tin foil. I've posted almost nothing online - not under pseudonyms nor real names - for over a decade. I sat on this HN username for almost 12 years before making a sing…

I find it fulfilling to enrich the commons.

Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey

#57

Post by CTDOCodebases »

post-it wrote: post #43
mikestorrent wrote: post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How does that defend against something having trained on a corpus of your own previous writing?

I think what they're saying is, run a local model to transform all your comments before you post them.

Bingo. It can’t help with old writings but it can with new writings.

Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey

#58

Post by furyofantares »

> But it can get uncannily far. I asked a close friend who doesn’t have public social media accounts or much writing online for permission to test some things she had said in a Discord channel. Asked to guess the author, Claude 4.7 failed — but it guessed two other people who were in that channel and who are close friends of hers (me and another person who has an internet presence).

Is this "uncannily far"? Another read is that it loves guessing Kelsey Piper.

Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey

#59

Post by sigmar »

oceanplexian wrote: post #34

> That includes gay people like me, who could hardly have admitted under our names to how we lived our lives for most of America’s history, as well as many other groups with minoritarian lifestyles While the points made are completely valid I want to point out that the statement of "Hey, by the way, first let me talk about my sexuality" lowers the quality of dialog a significant degree. 31 million people in America a…

>It also quietly insinuates that only people with a certain minority lifestyle would care about privacy or that their privacy is somehow more important than others. It's not.

How exactly does their post insinuate that? this comment is the "I don't even see color" as applied to internet privacy (with a touch of "just don't rub it in our faces")

Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey

#60

Post by astrange »

vslira wrote: post #38

Hm, that’s a multinomial classification with a very high cardinality. It’s really weird it works. I’m sure it does as the author states, but for how many authors (out of the whole web) does this work?

Maybe it just says all writing is Kelsey Piper.
Post reply on HN