Live data from Hacker News

Interview with Bob Odenkirk

nytimes.com

51–60 of 153 posts

Re: Interview with Bob Odenkirk

#52
post #144

[stub for offtopicness] [article authors don't write these headlines, you guys - let alone interview subjects]

This is the kind of thought that only rich and successful people can have. If you're working every day in a coal mine so you can feed your children otherwise they will go hungry, then you don't have these kind of thoughts. Similarly, if you're fighting in a war so your family isn't raped or murdered then you don't have these kind of thoughts either. Basically, you're lucky if you live in a situation that gives you th…

Your last sentence claims that he should appreciate how lucky he is. But this is a different question from what, at face value, the statement that life is meaningless or absurd is about. The two choices (first being operative in this thread):

1. Life is meaningless: descriptive claim

2. You ought to appreciate life to the best of your ability: normative claim

Your argument has no bearing on the first claim.

Re: Interview with Bob Odenkirk

#53
post #9
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The world is like a ride in an amusement park. And when you choose to go on it you think it's real because that's how powerful our minds are. And the ride goes up and down and round and round. It has thrills and chills and it's very brightly colored and it's very loud and it's fun, for a while. Some people have been on the ride for a long time and they begin to question: "Is this real, or is this just a ride?" And…

So basically, Buddhism?

[deleted]

Re: Interview with Bob Odenkirk

#54
post #18
post #144

[stub for offtopicness] [article authors don't write these headlines, you guys - let alone interview subjects]

When you're successful and rich (enough, at least), this is a nice whimsical thing to say. When you're suffering in the trenches, this isn't very helpful.

[deleted]

Re: Interview with Bob Odenkirk

#55
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I really enjoyed Better Call Saul and thought it was much much better than Breaking Bad. Walter White was such an irritating character. Saul was a brilliant hustler.

I could see Better Call Saul appealing more to the Hacker News community than Breaking Bad. Kim and Jimmy often give off founder/startup energy (e.g. S2E7)

Re: Interview with Bob Odenkirk

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you're saying that life isn't a farce? Or that it is, and poor people don't ponder it? Just expressing disapproval of rich people?

the only thesis/proposition i see in the comment would be: "poor people don't think about it" no other claims

Well, I didn't expect I would have to spell it out.

But seriously think about it. Why doesn't your pet dog sit around thinking about what a farce life is?

How many people who were living in the 1700s do you think sat around thinking life is a farce?

Ponder on that question. Out of everyone living in the world today, how many people do you think sit around thinking life is a farce, who are those people? Why do you think they are thinking this?

I think it's an important question to ask and think about. It's saying something about our society, way of life, way of seeing the world.

Re: Interview with Bob Odenkirk

#57
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I couldn’t make it through Breaking Bad, but I couldn’t put down Better Call Saul. Different boats for different floats.

How far through did you get? I think it gets significantly better in season 2, and continues improving thereafter. Basically after they starting bringing in bigger overarching storylines. I made a few false starts where I couldn’t really get through season 1, but after I persisted it was worth it.

S2 gives off a lot of founder/startup energy. I could see it appealing to Hacker News community

Re: Interview with Bob Odenkirk

#58
post #26
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When you're successful and rich (enough, at least), this is a nice whimsical thing to say. When you're suffering in the trenches, this isn't very helpful.

Your comment is exactly what successful and rich people say. You can find a lot of joy and acceptance among the poorest of people: the mind is remarkably adaptable, yet it's only those that always strive for more that cannot enjoy life's little moments. I truly dislike this recent trend of making people feel bad if they have learned to just slow down and be content with life. "It's privilege being able to take a brea…

if you are too busy to think consequently everything you are doing is without knowing any justification or explanation

"too busy" is arguing for ignorance, which is defensible but not agreed on

Re: Interview with Bob Odenkirk

#59
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the contrary, read the piece. He's not saying it from comfort, he's saying it after a heart attack, after his kids grew up, after the form he loved became a young man's game. The farce isn't a punchline delivered from above; it's what's left when the registers that used to hold you don't anymore. And his answer isn't despair, it's "we've got to keep trying… there's a breeze beneath my wings." That's not whimsy. Th…

A triple "It's not this... it's that"...

like a lot of tweets in my timeline these days

Re: Interview with Bob Odenkirk

#60
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I really enjoyed Better Call Saul and thought it was much much better than Breaking Bad. Walter White was such an irritating character. Saul was a brilliant hustler.

Yeah, I abandoned Breaking Bad around mid-season 2 because of how boring, slow, and repetitive it had become. Better Call Saul, on the other hand, was constantly clicking for me, from one episode to another. The writing is magnificent. There were a few slow-rollers, of course, but they were nothing compared to drip-feeding in Breaking Bad.
Post reply on HN