Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please, I'm just a self aware nerd.
Not nearly self-aware enough, if you were to go around saying such things to people in person. What a shocking insult, to tell someone their very voice sounds unhuman! I can't say you should never, of course, but I would hope very much you reserve such calumny only for when it has been thoroughly earned. But of course this is only a website, where there are in any case no drinks of any sort to go flying for any reaso…
Even 'uncensored' models can't say what they want
51–60 of 155 posts
Re: Even 'uncensored' models can't say what they want
#52> No refusal fires, no warning appears — the probability just moves I don't really understand why this type of pattern occurs, where the later words in a sentence don't properly connect to the earlier ones in AI-generated text. "The probability just moves" should, in fluent English, be something like "the model just selects a different word". And "no warning appears" shouldn't be in the sentence at all, as it adds no…
Surely I cannot be the only one who finds some degree of humor in a bunch of nerds being put off by the first gen of "real" AI being much more like a charismatic extroverted socialite than a strictly logical monotone robot.
Re: Even 'uncensored' models can't say what they want
#53We started with a Polymarket project: train a Karoline Leavitt LoRA on an uncensored model, simulate future briefings, trade the word markets, profit. We couldn't get it to work. No amount of fine-tuning let the model actually say what Karoline said on camera. It kept softening the charged word.
Not even the most unleashed models can utter the words of today’s politicians, I don’t know if this says more about the current technology or the people in charge.
Re: Even 'uncensored' models can't say what they want
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
> After an insult like that Did I miss something?
> "real" AI being much more like a charismatic extroverted socialite As I said in my opening clause here, I fit that description exactly, and "'real' AI," as my original interlocutor would have it, sounds nothing like me. The insult arises from the fact that "'real' AI" sounds nothing particularly like anyone, because it isn't any one: if it had eyes there would be nothing happening behind them. This is why it keeps…
That’s what you think of yourself, but I dunno man, you just sound like a massive fuckwit.
Did someone step in dogshit and walk through your living room, or is it just that time of month?
Re: Even 'uncensored' models can't say what they want
#55> Type this into a language model and ask it what word to put in the blank: The family faces immediate _____ without any legal recourse. For what it's worth, Claude Opus 4.7 says "eviction" (which I think is an equally good answer) but adds that "deportation" could also work "depending on context". https://claude.ai/share/ba6093b9-d2ba-40a6-b4e1-7e2eb37df748
Re: Even 'uncensored' models can't say what they want
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please, I'm just a self aware nerd.
Not nearly self-aware enough, if you were to go around saying such things to people in person. What a shocking insult, to tell someone their very voice sounds unhuman! I can't say you should never, of course, but I would hope very much you reserve such calumny only for when it has been thoroughly earned. But of course this is only a website, where there are in any case no drinks of any sort to go flying for any reaso…
Re: Even 'uncensored' models can't say what they want
#57> No refusal fires, no warning appears — the probability just moves I don't really understand why this type of pattern occurs, where the later words in a sentence don't properly connect to the earlier ones in AI-generated text. "The probability just moves" should, in fluent English, be something like "the model just selects a different word". And "no warning appears" shouldn't be in the sentence at all, as it adds no…
Surely I cannot be the only one who finds some degree of humor in a bunch of nerds being put off by the first gen of "real" AI being much more like a charismatic extroverted socialite than a strictly logical monotone robot.
Re: Even 'uncensored' models can't say what they want
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
> After an insult like that Did I miss something?
> "real" AI being much more like a charismatic extroverted socialite As I said in my opening clause here, I fit that description exactly, and "'real' AI," as my original interlocutor would have it, sounds nothing like me. The insult arises from the fact that "'real' AI" sounds nothing particularly like anyone, because it isn't any one: if it had eyes there would be nothing happening behind them. This is why it keeps…
Re: Even 'uncensored' models can't say what they want
#59> No refusal fires, no warning appears — the probability just moves I don't really understand why this type of pattern occurs, where the later words in a sentence don't properly connect to the earlier ones in AI-generated text. "The probability just moves" should, in fluent English, be something like "the model just selects a different word". And "no warning appears" shouldn't be in the sentence at all, as it adds no…
Surely I cannot be the only one who finds some degree of humor in a bunch of nerds being put off by the first gen of "real" AI being much more like a charismatic extroverted socialite than a strictly logical monotone robot.
Re: Even 'uncensored' models can't say what they want
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not nearly self-aware enough, if you were to go around saying such things to people in person. What a shocking insult, to tell someone their very voice sounds unhuman! I can't say you should never, of course, but I would hope very much you reserve such calumny only for when it has been thoroughly earned. But of course this is only a website, where there are in any case no drinks of any sort to go flying for any reaso…
Is this an AI response? Serious question. They’re taking a website comment a bit personally and threatening throwing drinks in peoples faces.
It is, though, interesting to me that you see someone behave in a way you aren't expecting and don't quite know how to wrap your head around - no blame; it's a relatively common experience in my vicinity, though normal people typically enjoy it much more than those here - and your immediate recourse is to assume it must have been generated by AI. That's interesting indeed, and I greatly appreciate you sharing it.