Live data from Hacker News

Tinybox – A powerful computer for deep learning

tinygrad.org

51–60 of 372 posts

Re: Tinybox – A powerful computer for deep learning

#51

The incremental price increases between products is funny. $12,000, $65,000, $10,000,000.

I was more worried by the 600kW power requirement... that's 200 houses at full load (3kw) in southern europe... which likely means 400 houses at half load.

the town near my hometown has 650 – 800 houses (according to chatgpt).

crazy.

Re: Tinybox – A powerful computer for deep learning

#52
post #33

Finally, a computer that should be able to run Monster Hunter Wilds with decent performance. But let’s be real, 12k is kinda pushing it - what kind of people are gonna spend $65k or even $10M (lmao WTAF) on a boutique thing like this. I dont think these kinds of things go in datacenters (happy to be corrected) and they are way too expensive (and probably way too HOT) to just go in a home or even an office “closet”.

It’s not for people to buy. It’s for companies to buy. Compare to salary, and it’s cheap.

What companies are buying this instead of like a Dell server or whatever?

Re: Tinybox – A powerful computer for deep learning

#53
post #33

Finally, a computer that should be able to run Monster Hunter Wilds with decent performance. But let’s be real, 12k is kinda pushing it - what kind of people are gonna spend $65k or even $10M (lmao WTAF) on a boutique thing like this. I dont think these kinds of things go in datacenters (happy to be corrected) and they are way too expensive (and probably way too HOT) to just go in a home or even an office “closet”.

It’s not for people to buy. It’s for companies to buy. Compare to salary, and it’s cheap.

Hm, I compared my salary with $10M and it doesn't feel cheap. I guess skill issue.

Re: Tinybox – A powerful computer for deep learning

#54

There's no way the red v2 is doing anything with a 120b parameter model. I just finished building a dual a100 ai homelab (80gb vram combined with nvlink). Similar stats otherwise. 120b only fits with very heavy quantization, enough to make the model schizophrenic in my experience. And there's no room for kv, so you'll OOM around 4k of context. I'm running a 70b model now that's okay, but it's still fairly tight. And…

> And there's no room for kv, so you'll OOM around 4k of context.

Can't you offload KV to system RAM, or even storage? It would make it possible to run with longer contexts, even with some overhead. AIUI, local AI frameworks include support for caching some of the KV in VRAM, using a LRU policy, so the overhead would be tolerable.

Re: Tinybox – A powerful computer for deep learning

#55
post #22

What’s the most effective ~$5k setup today? Interested in what people are actually running.

With $5k you have to make compromises. Which compromises you are willing to make depends on what you want to do - and so there will be different optimal setup.

Re: Tinybox – A powerful computer for deep learning

#56
post #22

What’s the most effective ~$5k setup today? Interested in what people are actually running.

Fully aware of the DGX spark I've actually been looking into AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395/392 machines. There's some interesting things here like https://www.bee-link.com/products/beelink-gtr9-pro-amd-ryzen... and https://www.amazon.com/GMKtec-5-1GHz-LPDDR5X-8000MHz-Display... ... haven't pulled the trigger yet but apparently inferencing on these chips are not trash.

Machines with the 4xx chips are coming next month so maybe wait a week or two.

It's soldered LPDDR5X with amd strix halo ... sglang and llama.cpp can do that pretty well these days. And it's, you know, half the price and you're not locked into the Nvidia ecosystem

Re: Tinybox – A powerful computer for deep learning

#57

There's no way the red v2 is doing anything with a 120b parameter model. I just finished building a dual a100 ai homelab (80gb vram combined with nvlink). Similar stats otherwise. 120b only fits with very heavy quantization, enough to make the model schizophrenic in my experience. And there's no room for kv, so you'll OOM around 4k of context. I'm running a 70b model now that's okay, but it's still fairly tight. And…

> And there's no room for kv, so you'll OOM around 4k of context. Can't you offload KV to system RAM, or even storage? It would make it possible to run with longer contexts, even with some overhead. AIUI, local AI frameworks include support for caching some of the KV in VRAM, using a LRU policy, so the overhead would be tolerable.

Not worth it. It is a very significant performance hit.

With that said, people are trying to extend VRAM into system RAM or even NVMe storage, but as soon as you hit the PCI bus with the high bandwidth layers like KV cache, you eliminate a lot of the performance benefit that you get from having fast memory near the GPU die.

Re: Tinybox – A powerful computer for deep learning

#58

Cool that you have a dual power supply model. It says rack mountable or free standing. Does that mean two form factors? $65K is more than we can afford right now but we are definitely eventually in the market for something we can run in our own colo. It's funny though... we're using deepseek now for features in our service and based on our customer-type we thought that they would be completely against sending their d…

[flagged]

The real case for private inference is not "organic", it's "slow food". Offering slow-but-cheap inference is an afterthought for the big model providers, e.g. OpenRouter doesn't support it, not even as a way of redirecting to existing "batched inference" offerings. This is a natural opening for local AI.

Re: Tinybox – A powerful computer for deep learning

#59
post #31
post #22

What’s the most effective ~$5k setup today? Interested in what people are actually running.

DGX Spark is a fantastic option at this price point. You get 128GB VRAM which is extremely difficult to get at this price point. Also it’s a fairly fast GPU. And stupidly fast networking - 200gbps or 400gbps mellanox if you find coin for another one.

I’m not very well versed in this domain, but I think it’s not going to be “VRAM” (GDDR) memory, but rather “unified memory”, which is essentially RAM (some flavour of DDR5 I assume). These two types of memory has vastly different bandwidth.

I’m pretty curious to see any benchmarks on inference on VRAM vs UM.

Re: Tinybox – A powerful computer for deep learning

#60
post #48
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

DGX Spark is a fantastic option at this price point. You get 128GB VRAM which is extremely difficult to get at this price point. Also it’s a fairly fast GPU. And stupidly fast networking - 200gbps or 400gbps mellanox if you find coin for another one.

Can even network 4 of these together, using a pretty cheap InfiniBand switch. There is a YouTube video of a guy building and benchmarking such setup. For 5K one can get a desktop PC with RTX 5090, that has 3x more compute, but 4x less VRAM - so depending on the workload may be a better option.

VRAM vs UM is not exactly apples to apples comparison.
Post reply on HN