Live data from Hacker News

GitHub having issues [resolved]

githubstatus.com

51–60 of 150 posts

Re: GitHub having issues [resolved]

#51
post #6

I would so very much love to see GitHub switch gears from building stuff like Copilot etc and focus on availability

This is an absurd state they are at! Weekly outages in 2025 and 2026. From developer beloved and very solid to Microslop went faster than I expected

Re: GitHub having issues [resolved]

#52
post #47

In moments like this, it's useful to have a "break glass" mode in your CI tooling: a way to run a production CI pipeline from scratch, when your production CI infrastructure is down. Otherwise, if your CI downtime coincides with other production downtime, you might find yourself with a "bricked" platform. I've seen it happen and it is not fun. It can be a pain to setup a break-glass, especially if you have a lot of l…

100%. We used to design the pipeline a way that is easily reproducible locally, e.g. doesn’t rely on plugins of the CI runtime. Think build.sh shell script, normally invoked by CI runner but just as easy to run locally.

Re: GitHub having issues [resolved]

#53

How many 9s is GitHub at now? 2?

Github service has a better work life balance than many engineers here...

Octocat (The OG github mascot) has a family that it goes to the park with anytime he wants.

Luckily his boss Microslop, is busy with destroying windows of his house and banning people from its discord server.

Re: GitHub having issues [resolved]

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Except actually it was, that was what my git client was reporting trying to run a pull.

I'm going to trust the constant stream of updates from the company itself which shows exactly what went down and came back up rather than a random anecdote.

I only found this post because I decided to check HN after getting HTTP 500 errors pulling some repos.

Re: GitHub having issues [resolved]

#59

In many companies I worked for, there were a bunch of infrastructure astronauts who made everything very complicated in the name of zero downtime and sold them to management as “downtime would kill pur credibility and our businesses ”, and then you have billion dollar companies everyone relies on (GitHub, Cloudflare) who have repeated downtime yet it doesn't seem to affect their business in any way.

Businesses are incommensurate.

GitHub is a distributed version control storage hub with additional add-on features. If peeps can’t work around a git server/hub being down and don’t know to have independent reproducible builds or integrations and aren’t using project software wildly better that GitHubs’, there are issues. And for how much money? A few hundred per dev per year? Forget total revenue, the billions, the entire thing is a pile of ‘suck it up, buttercup’ with ToS to match.

In contrast, I’ve been working for a private company selling patient-touching healthcare solutions and we all would have committed seppuku with outages like this. Yeah, zero downtime or as close to it as possible even if it means fixing MS bugs before they do. Fines, deaths, and public embarrassment were potential results of downtime.

All investments become smart or dumb depending on context. If management agrees that downtime would be lethal my prejudice would be to believe them since they know the contracts and sales perspective. If ‘they crashed that one time’ stops all sales, the 0% revenue makes being 30% faster than those astronauts irrelevant.

Re: GitHub having issues [resolved]

#60
post #44
post #9

I swear this is my fault. I can go weeks without doing infra work. Github does fine, I don't see any hiccups, status page is all green. But the day comes that I need to tweak a deploy flow, or update our testing infra and about halfway through the task I take the whole thing down. It's gotten to the point where when there's an outage I'm the first person people ask what I'm doing...and it's pretty dang consistent....

do you know the Pauli-Effect? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_effect

At my old job we’d call that Daily bogons (my last name). Didn’t know I was in such illustrious company.
Post reply on HN