Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

twitter.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 146 posts

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#51

Post by daemonologist »

botusaurus wrote: post #3

> But NanoClaw isn't just my personal project anymore. Thousands of people are using it. People are running production workloads on it. Businesses are building on it. There's a real community now. as OpenClaw and now NanoClaw became "enterprise", now we need a new FemtoClaw to pick up the indie/boutique place

I'm sure whatever LLM FemtoClaw calls out to will also write a blurb about its growing adoption in production enterprise applications. This sentiment is probably very well represented in the training data.

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#53

Post by wolpoli »

guld wrote: post #45
imiric wrote: post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's old news. Now there's Plancklaw, renamed to ∅. It has no code base, no bugs, no security issues, infinitely scalable, and all the features of every other *claw.

Well actually there is ROE.md, no code, just a Markdown file to generate a claw.

The code is always generated using the latest LLM, ensuring that it takes advantage of the latest architectures and programming language features.

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#54

Post by einarfd »

I’ve been building sandboxing for Claude code workloads. So I can let it run wild without breaking my computer. Originally I used docker, but I’m now in the process of jettisoning that, and switching to qemu.

For my use case I want ssh access and being able to use docker in docker. This allows for things like test containers and docker compose. You can get all of that working with docker. But you kind of have to fight docker the whole way.

NanoClaw might have different needs, and docker could work better for it, and I hope so for their sake. But I’m not optimistic.

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#55

Post by sergiotapia »

I installed nanoclaw last night funny to see it here on HN.

It was easy to install it, and get it running. I could @Andy message it on whatsapp but after that it fell apart fast.

I asked it to login to Facebook and check my notifications, and it started saving credentials and random things in the repo as json files. And din't work. It was hard to even figure out what was happening and why it didn't work.

Then I tried messaging it again and it didn't respond to me.

These things are extremely brittle despite the enourmous amount of github stars. I think it's just normies starring things trying to get on the train unfortunately. The promise of an AI Jarvis is unrealized still.

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#56

Post by dgellow »

mpweiher wrote: post #48
stavros wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're "always" running, so they can notify you out of the blue, without you having to initiate a conversation. It's really nice UX to get a message from my assistant saying "hey, it's time to leave for the gym, and don't forget the supermarket bag because you're picking up milk on the way back, as you've run out".

Dunno, my calendar reminds me "out of the blue", without me having to initiate a conversation, that it's time to leave for the gym, no "claw" or "ai" involved. I always have my backpack with me, so if I need milk I can pick it up on the way back. And I am pretty sure that I have to notice if I need milk myself. The tech sounds cool, but whenever I hear about actual applications, I don't see the point.

Everything I’ve seen about it feels so over engineered

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#57

Post by Rapzid »

botusaurus wrote: post #3

> But NanoClaw isn't just my personal project anymore. Thousands of people are using it. People are running production workloads on it. Businesses are building on it. There's a real community now. as OpenClaw and now NanoClaw became "enterprise", now we need a new FemtoClaw to pick up the indie/boutique place

MicroClaw.. No fear of it becoming corporate LOL.

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#58

Post by stavros »

mpweiher wrote: post #48
stavros wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're "always" running, so they can notify you out of the blue, without you having to initiate a conversation. It's really nice UX to get a message from my assistant saying "hey, it's time to leave for the gym, and don't forget the supermarket bag because you're picking up milk on the way back, as you've run out".

Dunno, my calendar reminds me "out of the blue", without me having to initiate a conversation, that it's time to leave for the gym, no "claw" or "ai" involved. I always have my backpack with me, so if I need milk I can pick it up on the way back. And I am pretty sure that I have to notice if I need milk myself. The tech sounds cool, but whenever I hear about actual applications, I don't see the point.

If you don't have a need for a personal assistant, that's fine, not everyone does. That doesn't mean nobody does.

The milk thing was just an example of a tool that can intelligently combine things for you, not a literal "it's a calendar with a milk function".

This is a bit like "if I want to call my friends, I have a phone a home, why would I need a mobile?" which somewhat betrays a lack of imagination.

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#59

Post by olyjohn »

stavros wrote: post #58
mpweiher wrote: post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dunno, my calendar reminds me "out of the blue", without me having to initiate a conversation, that it's time to leave for the gym, no "claw" or "ai" involved. I always have my backpack with me, so if I need milk I can pick it up on the way back. And I am pretty sure that I have to notice if I need milk myself. The tech sounds cool, but whenever I hear about actual applications, I don't see the point.

If you don't have a need for a personal assistant, that's fine, not everyone does. That doesn't mean nobody does. The milk thing was just an example of a tool that can intelligently combine things for you, not a literal "it's a calendar with a milk function". This is a bit like "if I want to call my friends, I have a phone a home, why would I need a mobile?" which somewhat betrays a lack of imagination.

You're just not providing any good examples of what I cant already do with current automation tools.

Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker

#60

Post by wat10000 »

botusaurus wrote: post #3

> But NanoClaw isn't just my personal project anymore. Thousands of people are using it. People are running production workloads on it. Businesses are building on it. There's a real community now. as OpenClaw and now NanoClaw became "enterprise", now we need a new FemtoClaw to pick up the indie/boutique place

We need to go the other direction. GigaClaw eats $100,000/month in tokens and requires a Threadripper with 256GB of RAM on a gigabit connection just to handle the orchestration.
Post reply on HN