Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well nowadays you individually track by using mac addresses and other network information from the devices within range. Cisco has some creepy real time maps of your location with each person walking around and all their previous visits etc
Modern phones connect with a randomized MAC address. So yes, you can track a person around, but you will need another system (like the WiFi login page) to match MAC to identity.
WiFi could become an invisible mass surveillance system
51–60 of 199 posts
Re: WiFi could become an invisible mass surveillance system
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Modern phones connect with a randomized MAC address. So yes, you can track a person around, but you will need another system (like the WiFi login page) to match MAC to identity.
Really? I thought it was only I phones that did that though?
Re: WiFi could become an invisible mass surveillance system
#53Android devices already know exactly where they are even with GPS disabled, because they sniff the nearby WIFI networks and then ask Google where they are. QED Google knows already, all combined is mass metadata surveillance already provided to those that tap into it. Any sub-meter precision or presence detection does not really matter, if these companies have all your other questions, queries, messages, calendars, b…
Re: WiFi could become an invisible mass surveillance system
#54> The method takes advantage of normal network communication between connected devices and the router. These devices regularly send feedback signals within the network, known as beamforming feedback information (BFI), which are transmitted without encryption and can be read by anyone within range. > By collecting this data, images of people can be generated from multiple perspectives, allowing individuals to be ident…
Resolution and positional accuracy are very poor. It’s more like ‘an approximate bag of water detector’. Gait analysis is complete fiction. Especially with a non-visual approach like this.
Re: WiFi could become an invisible mass surveillance system
#55Re: WiFi could become an invisible mass surveillance system
#56> The method takes advantage of normal network communication between connected devices and the router. These devices regularly send feedback signals within the network, known as beamforming feedback information (BFI), which are transmitted without encryption and can be read by anyone within range. > By collecting this data, images of people can be generated from multiple perspectives, allowing individuals to be ident…
The researchers never claimed to generate "images," that's editorializing by this publication. The pipeline just generates a confidence value for correlating one capture from the same sensor setup with another.
[Sidenote: did ACM really go "Open Access" but gate PDF download behind the paid tier? Or is the download link just very well hidden in their crappy PDF viewer?]
Re: WiFi could become an invisible mass surveillance system
#57So, should I start walking around with a jammer or something?
Re: WiFi could become an invisible mass surveillance system
#58Re: WiFi could become an invisible mass surveillance system
#59Paper: https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/3719027.3765062
I don't feel that this article is a fair summary of the paper. And the title is just clickbait. The paper says, in a somewhat contrived scenario, with dozens of labelled walkthroughs per person, they can identify that person from their gait based on CSI and other WiFi information. This is a long way from identifying one person in thousands or tens of thousands, being able to transfer identifying patterns among statio…
> a study with 197 participants, the team could infer the identity of persons with almost 100% accuracy – independently of the perspective or their gait.
The paper seems to make it clear that the technique still depends on gait analysis, but claims it's more robust against gait variations.
Re: WiFi could become an invisible mass surveillance system
#60This is a VERY controlled environment - and they used 20 passes of each person walking with direct knowledge of each person to train for identity. They did no tests with multiple people walking at the same time, or with any other external moving distortion effects (doors opening, etc) . This is very far from actual 'identification' of people in real public settings - and no doubt the cell phone everyone is carrying w…
Even Xfinity has motion detection in homes using this technique now: