Live data from Hacker News

CIA suddenly stops publishing, removes archives of The World Factbook

simonwillison.net

51–60 of 197 posts

Re: CIA suddenly stops publishing, removes archives of The World Factbook

#51
post #17

I used the CIA factbook so much in college in the early 2000's when looking at so many things. When researching countries to support and travel to it made sense to vreview it beforehand. Its insane that this as a resource would be taken down.

It gets cited a lot in immigration litigation as well (eg in asylum arguments) because it's an unimpeachable factual source that the government's lawyers can't reasonably dispute.

Re: CIA suddenly stops publishing, removes archives of The World Factbook

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We're definitely going in the direction of "might is right". The "palantirization" of data stores (not just those for surveillance) is going to be an enabler of the "hard power" you're alluding to. This whole platform is probably a dragnet for identifying intelligent people with dissident views. Expect things to get uglier and stranger as well.

Power also needs to be justified. Hitler is an example of "unjustifiable might." And all fools who want to promote Darwinism need to know that causing one's own extinction is far easier than causing one's own evolution. Evolution is merely a survivor bias, and Darwin's On the Origin of Species didn't analyze the patterns of extinction.The evolutionary pattern should be that only when you yourself are perfectly ration…

Book 1 of Plato: Republic demonstrates the folly of such thinking.

Re: CIA suddenly stops publishing, removes archives of The World Factbook

#53
One consequence: The World Factbook is often used in immigration applications as a "you won't get hassled" source of information about conflicts, involvement with the military, etc. (The same is true about State Department assessments of human rights violations.)

Re: CIA suddenly stops publishing, removes archives of The World Factbook

#55
post #48

This is surely just the tip of the iceberg of what is going on in the CIA at the moment. Senator Ron Wyden just sent a mysterious public letter about concerns about what they are doing. https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5724300-ron-wyden-cia-le...

There's this from 2022, but there are probably many concerns from Wyden:

https://apnews.com/article/congress-cia-ron-wyden-martin-hei...

Re: CIA suddenly stops publishing, removes archives of The World Factbook

#57
post #17

I used the CIA factbook so much in college in the early 2000's when looking at so many things. When researching countries to support and travel to it made sense to vreview it beforehand. Its insane that this as a resource would be taken down.

It gets cited a lot in immigration litigation as well (eg in asylum arguments) because it's an unimpeachable factual source that the government's lawyers can't reasonably dispute.

Now that you mention it, I'm pretty convinced this is the reason they took it down. If you can't dispute the facts, get rid of them, I guess.

Re: CIA suddenly stops publishing, removes archives of The World Factbook

#59

[flagged]

It was updated weekly. Constantly writing and maintaining so much information is almost certainly very expensive. Coupled with the fact that you have to be very careful before releasing each edit to make sure that no accidental personal beliefs or theories slip by (as that would be a diplomatic catastrophe), I reckon the cost of maintaining the thing could be very high. I would wager that they're still going to maint…

If it was about the cost of updating it, they wouldn't need to remove the archived versions.

Re: CIA suddenly stops publishing, removes archives of The World Factbook

#60
post #48

This is surely just the tip of the iceberg of what is going on in the CIA at the moment. Senator Ron Wyden just sent a mysterious public letter about concerns about what they are doing. https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5724300-ron-wyden-cia-le...

Whenever there's a mystery, apply the scientific method to investigate it. Form a hypothesis, an experiment or test , then record the results and check if they support.

Hypothesis: CIA is hacking reporters to determine their government sources.

If we start seeing more government sources exposed, we haven't proven it but it supports the hypothesis.

Hypothesis: State election systems are being compromised for federal monitoring and control.

If we start seeing more improbable results in one direction, that is support for the hypothesis.

Post reply on HN