Netbird – Open Source Zero Trust Networking
51–60 of 299 posts
Re: Netbird – Open Source Zero Trust Networking
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
The word "auth keys" meant nothing to you, I guess: https://tailscale.com/kb/1085/auth-keys
What would be your use-case for auth keys with long expiry times? Auth keys are only required for registering new nodes.
I don’t understand how they can have such a strategy, and then not having any decent way to programmatically allocate new keys.
Re: Netbird – Open Source Zero Trust Networking
#53But it's missing a tailscale funnel like feature, right? That's one of the main features that I use for some home assistant instances.
Do not expose anything without authentication.
And absolutely do not expose a folder with something like `python -m http.server -b 0.0.0.0 8080` if you have .git in it, someone will help themselves to it immediately.
If you are aware of this, funnel works fine and is not insecure.
Tailscale IMHO failing in educating people about this danger. They do mention in on the docs, but I think it should be a big red warning when you start it, because people clearly does not realise this.
I took a quick look a while ago and watching just part of the CT firehose, I found 35 .git folders in 30 minutes.
No idea if there was anything sensitive I just did a HEAD check against `.git/index` if I recall.
Re: Netbird – Open Source Zero Trust Networking
#54Last time I checked it couldn't do ipv6... in 2026?
Re: Netbird – Open Source Zero Trust Networking
#551. Trust a third party like Tailscale by giving them the key to your kingdom, but everything is incredibly easy and secure.
2. Self-host but need at least one host with a fixed IP address and an open port on the Internet. What requires a set of security skills and constant monitoring. That includes headscale, selhosted netbird, zerotier or a private yggdrasil mesh.
Re: Netbird – Open Source Zero Trust Networking
#56Last time I checked it couldn't do ipv6... in 2026?
Could be intentional: German privacy advocates really like that the limited ipv4 pool forces reusing IPs and prevents accidental imprinting a practically static address on a device.
But self-hosting still require at least a public domain name [0], so here goes your privacy right?
- [0] https://docs.netbird.io/selfhosted/selfhosted-quickstart#inf...
Re: Netbird – Open Source Zero Trust Networking
#57Re: Netbird – Open Source Zero Trust Networking
#58Last time I checked it couldn't do ipv6... in 2026?
Could be intentional: German privacy advocates really like that the limited ipv4 pool forces reusing IPs and prevents accidental imprinting a practically static address on a device.
Re: Netbird – Open Source Zero Trust Networking
#59Last time I checked it couldn't do ipv6... in 2026?
Re: Netbird – Open Source Zero Trust Networking
#60But it's missing a tailscale funnel like feature, right? That's one of the main features that I use for some home assistant instances.
Out of curiosity, why? I use TS for all my homelab bits (including my HA instance), but connect to TS before opening the HA app. Is it just a case of making it easier/ possible to connect if you’re on another VPN? Are you not concerned with having something from your local network open to the internet?