This post seems to be haphazardly proposing that big tech will inevitably make everyone's lives miserable. And by working for them, you are enabling this. It offers no constructive alternative and the author (yes, I know who he is) seems to have no issue with Google hosting their email. It's hard to take this too seriously (even if there is some legitimate worry here)
Big tech is making everyone's life miserable: social media, advertising, surveillance. By working for them you are enabling this.
You have three minutes to escape the perpetual underclass
51–60 of 251 posts
Re: You have three minutes to escape the perpetual underclass
#52Sometimes people just need to touch (literal) grass No gpt18Pro won't cost $1Bi dollars. The buck (or the bubble) will stop somewhere. I'd be more worried for the people making trades run 1ms faster, they literally create no value to the world that is not something their own peers believe it There are billions of people not knowing and not caring about what is chatgpt and while it might hit them hard, humans are more…
Why?
Re: You have three minutes to escape the perpetual underclass
#53Hard to take seriously from a guy who has Facebook, Google, and Twitter on his CV.
I noticed an interesting pattern. People who “made it” usually by working high paying jobs for the neofeudal lords, suddenly gain moral compass and tell the rest of us to not work for said neofeudal lords, because “money is not important”, and apparently you can buy a place to live or food to feed your family simply by having principles.
Re: You have three minutes to escape the perpetual underclass
#54Re: You have three minutes to escape the perpetual underclass
#55Hard to take seriously from a guy who has Facebook, Google, and Twitter on his CV.
I noticed an interesting pattern. People who “made it” usually by working high paying jobs for the neofeudal lords, suddenly gain moral compass and tell the rest of us to not work for said neofeudal lords, because “money is not important”, and apparently you can buy a place to live or food to feed your family simply by having principles.
Re: You have three minutes to escape the perpetual underclass
#56Such situations usually correct themselves violently.
Re: You have three minutes to escape the perpetual underclass
#57Hard to take seriously from a guy who has Facebook, Google, and Twitter on his CV.
Even with the poor judgement to join Musk's twitter at all, he left a few weeks after joining, soon after ChatGPT was released. Before ChatGPT, the idea that the singularity was anywhere near was utterly fringe: tech version of all the new-age stuff, I think Charlie Stross described it as "Rapture for atheists" or something like that.
It's now… well, a lot of people with a lot of power are trying to *make it* be the singularity. I still don't think this is "it", despite how useful I find what we do have, but of the top 10 valued companies by market cap in Q4 last year, 9 are chasing it, the money is definitely interested, in a way it just wasn't when he worked at those places.
Re: You have three minutes to escape the perpetual underclass
#58> capital is the only force,
be squared with
> A pile of money will buy you nothing in the neofeudal world.
and
> didn’t operate on capitalist principles
? Capital being the driving force is the very definition of capitalism. It's even in its name!
Re: You have three minutes to escape the perpetual underclass
#59I couldn't disagree more. Throughout history, higher productivity leads to a higher quality of life for everyone. Yes, the transition can be painful and some people will lose out and face hard career changes. But overall, the multiplicative power of investment only increases, helping to make everything cheaper, and everyone richer. People focus too much on their own small part of experience - like Claude Code replaci…
Re: You have three minutes to escape the perpetual underclass
#60This post seems to be haphazardly proposing that big tech will inevitably make everyone's lives miserable. And by working for them, you are enabling this. It offers no constructive alternative and the author (yes, I know who he is) seems to have no issue with Google hosting their email. It's hard to take this too seriously (even if there is some legitimate worry here)
"Will"? If you don't see how this is happening today, you're either a part of the problem, or blissfully ignorant.
> It offers no constructive alternative
WDYM? The article clearly suggests that people should stop working for these companies.
Besides, why must every criticism propose a solution? The problem should be fixed by those who created it.