yet they won’t do anything on 1A grounds when “x” censors or shadow bans Americans without anything resembling good cause
other than maybe you looked at some eceleb cancer funny and got mass reported
or “voted for the wrong person.” The definition of which apparently changes on the whims of advertisers, empaneled government boards behind closed doors, or whoever buys the company—
(who, themselves might have the freedom to switch and vocally support different parties from one election to the next. But not you.)
curious.
I wish Luna and her colleagues would be as ardent about defending the 1A rights of Americans using these platforms in America, as she is about… anyone, anywhere in the world except for Americans.
So they can draft and or pass a bill cracking down on and sanctioning a whole entire government for suppressing speech of non Americans.
Twice! For Brazil and UK!
But they won’t draft or pass a bill that touches Meta or X or their ilk for suppressing legal, respectfully posited, non-obscene , non-violent speech of Americans. Speech where the only issue is that it displeases Toyota or Apple or Debbie Schultz or Allison Fauci … or whomever.
They’re not protecting UK citizens or anyone. They’re protecting the platforms and their income streams. That’s why they won’t ever do that.
I’m trying to be nice here but the nicest word I have for the United States Congress rn is “useless.”