[flagged]
The article includes a link to the original paper: https://subtbiol.pensoft.net/article/162344/
51–60 of 156 posts
[flagged]
The article includes a link to the original paper: https://subtbiol.pensoft.net/article/162344/
Earlier quoted context omitted.
From the article: > The vast spider population is attributed to an abundant food supply: more than 2.4 million midges in the cave, ready to be entangled in the intricate web. ...although I guess the question then is what sustains the millions of midges!
From the livescience article linked by another poster: biofilm produced by sulfur-eating bacteria, which in turn metabolize sulfur from the sulfur-rich stream in the cave. So the whole food-chain here is: sulfur -> bacteria -> midges -> spiders.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah same, we do not bother spiders in the house unless they jump into bed or on food or whatever, and then we just take them outside. With spiders and cats in the house we never see any flies or other insects.
I have a rule with the spiders where if they get too bold they get the vacuum. I don't mind them lurking in the corners but I don't want them crawling across my desk. I think most of them understand the arrangement by now. Only occasional enforcement is necessary.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
From the livescience article linked by another poster: biofilm produced by sulfur-eating bacteria, which in turn metabolize sulfur from the sulfur-rich stream in the cave. So the whole food-chain here is: sulfur -> bacteria -> midges -> spiders.
Seems like a great place for spider-eating frogs to move into.
The earth is full of wonders but we're destroying most of them.
Not "we", it's the billionaires.
In everyday parlance we say that you have a job and you have the skill, and in reality you actually are free to take your skill elsewhere. Your skill plays a part in the market value of your employer, but you stay or leave at your whim, the "owner" of the "asset" doesn't decide.
Those billions are IMO mostly an accounting fiction — it's better to think of it in the way that our ordinary language suggests, where your actions are yours, your skills are yours, etc. If you drive to work, that's your emissions based on your choice, it's not a choice made by someone whose great wealth is mostly an assessment of your skill and earning power.
If you build a house and need some concrete for that, CO₂ is emitted in a concrete factory, but I think it's better to regard the emitted CO₂ as a choice made by you than as emissions by the billionaire who owns the factory. Even if the accountants assess the value of the factory as a large number.
> The team of scientists discovered that 69,000 Tegenaria domestica , known as the barn funnel weaver, were living with about 42,000 Prinerigone vagans , which inhabit wet places. Usually the barn funnel weavers prey on P. vagans , which are smaller. > “But in the cave, because it’s dark in there, our hypothesis was that they do not see each other,” Blerina Vrenozi, a biologist, zoologist and ecologist at the Univers…
The earth is full of wonders but we're destroying most of them.
Not "we", it's the billionaires.
"The cave is full of hydrogen sulphide gas in too high concentrations for most animals to survive" Over a shot of a bunch of people walking around with no masks on?
Read a bit further, the very next sentence??? > “All you could smell was sulfur hydrogen, and you cannot breathe,” Dr. Vrenozi said, recalling that most of the researchers were wearing masks. But as they descended deeper into the cave, she said that “you get used to the smell of spoiled eggs.” Also, you use "" but you are not quoting, the text inside your quotes does not exist in the article. The actual quote would b…