Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams
51–60 of 468 posts
Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except in NL you guys actually have someone sit and think about the flow of traffic, in most other countries the design is usually pretty much random. In my parents' city in Poland they decided to turn off the traffic lights at night and the result is much higher number of accidents. Funnily, my father failed to yield the right of way exactly when talking about the issue. Yes, theoretically all intersections do have…
> Same setup in the Netherlands, there are right of way signs everywhere that apply when the lights don't work. Most places in Poland have this exact setup. And I say most because I have not seen one that does not, but I am guessing they exist. Maybe some of them have bad visibility even? If one does not respect the yield sign that does not seem a signaling problem.
Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams
#53Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Everyone should have understood that driving requires improvisation in the face of uncommon but inevitable bespoke challenges that this generation of AI is not suited for. Either because it's common sense or because so many people have been shouting it for so long.
But a citywide blackout isn’t that uncommon.
Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams
#55I'm surprised that either: 1. Nobody at Waymo thought of this, 2. Somebody did think of it but it wasn't considered important enough to prioritize, or 3. They tried to prep the cars for this and yet they nonetheless failed so badly
Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
>in many parts of the world where there are no traffic lights or stop signs, people get on just fine Well, sort of. Road injuries / fatalities in countries without these kinds of regulations are about an 3-4x higher than in those that do have them. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684
Number of traffic accidents went down by 50% in this town. https://worksthatwork.com/1/shared-space
Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
> miss the time when "confused" for a computer program was meant in a humorous way Not sure what about this isn’t funny. Nobody died. And the notion that traffic lights going down would not have otherwise caused congestion seems silly.
Not directly. But what about the emergency services not being able to reach their destinations? It stops being funny really fast
Did they have documented problems?
This is akin to the Waymos honking at each other at 3AM. Annoying. Potentially dangerous in various circumstances. But ultimately just destructive in a way unlikely to repeat.
Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
>in many parts of the world where there are no traffic lights or stop signs, people get on just fine Well, sort of. Road injuries / fatalities in countries without these kinds of regulations are about an 3-4x higher than in those that do have them. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684
Number of traffic accidents went down by 50% in this town. https://worksthatwork.com/1/shared-space
Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Number of traffic accidents went down by 50% in this town. https://worksthatwork.com/1/shared-space
Different things. A country with lax rules is not the same as a specific environment with shared spaces, where according to known data it's safer to eliminate some specific kind of regulation and let the remaining part take over.
Re: Waymo halts service during S.F. blackout after causing traffic jams
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Everyone should have understood that driving requires improvisation in the face of uncommon but inevitable bespoke challenges that this generation of AI is not suited for. Either because it's common sense or because so many people have been shouting it for so long.
I'd say driving only requires not to handle uncommon situation dangerously. And stopping when you can't handle something fits my criteria. Also I'm not sure it's entirely AI's fault. What do you do when you realistically have to break some rules? Like here, I assume you'd have to cut someone off if you don't want to wait forever. Who's gonna build a car that breaks rules sometimes, and what regulator will approve it?