If anyone from Planetscale is reading this, please know I hate what you did to your website. I previously had it bookmarked as an example of excellent, usable website design. About a year ago it turned into a plaintext nightmare. The first time I saw the new design I genuinely thought that a CSS file had failed to load in my browser. It's awful. *Edit:* It also fails to load other pages if you have JavaScript or XHR…
$50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres
51–60 of 73 posts
Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Considering they are charging an unfathomable $4529/mo for 256 GB databases, extrapolating that to a serious use case you can indeed just hire someone full-time with how much you'd save. And then you'll actually have someone who understands how databases work instead of treating it like an expensive black box. edit: my bad that's the price for 256GB RAM.
> $4529/month... can indeed just hire someone full-time That's $54,348/year, not including the cost of benefits, not including stock compensation. Let's say you reserve 20% for benefits and that comes out to $43,478.40 in salary. Besides the benefit of not needing the management / communication overhead of hiring somebody, do you know any DBAs willing to take a full-time job for $43,478.40 in salary?
Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres
#53If anyone from Planetscale is reading this, please know I hate what you did to your website. I previously had it bookmarked as an example of excellent, usable website design. About a year ago it turned into a plaintext nightmare. The first time I saw the new design I genuinely thought that a CSS file had failed to load in my browser. It's awful. *Edit:* It also fails to load other pages if you have JavaScript or XHR…
Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres
#54Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres
#55If anyone from Planetscale is reading this, please know I hate what you did to your website. I previously had it bookmarked as an example of excellent, usable website design. About a year ago it turned into a plaintext nightmare. The first time I saw the new design I genuinely thought that a CSS file had failed to load in my browser. It's awful. *Edit:* It also fails to load other pages if you have JavaScript or XHR…
It feels it went from "professional Stripe level design that you admire and it inspires you" to just "hard to read black website", not sure what for.
(not fully functional) https://web.archive.org/web/20240811142248/https://planetsca...
Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres
#56asking for a friend that liked this space
Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres
#57Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres
#58I haven't read HN for a while, this appears to just be an advertisement, did the rules change and advertisements for new products are promoted like product placement in movies? asking for a friend that liked this space
Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres
#59$50 bucks gets you an EIGHTH of a vCPU, 1GB RAM, and 10GB SSD??? This is quite frankly highway robbery. Not to mention the laughable bandwidth. Hetzner will give you 16 vCPU, 32GB RAM, and 640GB SSD for less than that. We're talking over an order of magnitude difference in value here.
Apparently there are people who find this offering compelling. The lack of value is quite stunning to me.
Re: $50 PlanetScale Metal Is GA for Postgres
#60Perhaps a naive question — but why would someone use a dedicated database provider and connect from another cloud provider's application service? ...as opposed to using the same provider's db + app service offering? Wouldn't this introduce additional latency among other issues?
I had the same latency concerns when I heard about this PaaS DB trend, but you’ll note that this runs in the AWS (soon GCP) region of your choice, so if you’re hosted there, it should be about the same latency as using their managed DB service. If you aren’t hosting the app in the same AWS/GCP region then I still have the same question.
yes and no. In my AWS account I can explicitly pick an AZ (us-east-2a, us-east-2b or us-east-2c) but Availability Zones are not consistent between AWS accounts.
See https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ram/latest/userguide/working-wit...