Do we need to be skeptical of NIH because of Trump? or they're still okay? Also, remember - don't take D on its own. Always with magnesium, or you get harmed by it, for all that it also does you good. Body is not built for raw D. Also also remember, D2 is a vitamin, D3 is a hormone.
The Big Vitamin D Mistake [pdf] (2017)
51–57 of 57 posts
Re: The Big Vitamin D Mistake [pdf] (2017)
#52It’s crazy how many of these comments completely ignored TFA. Hackernews is in decline and will be indistinguishable from Facebook or Reddit before long.
> However, the evidence for the health benefits of vitamin D supplementation in individuals who are already vitamin D sufficient is unproven.
andvitamin D is liposoluble so overdose is a risk. So I strongly recomend to ask a real medical doctor.
Re: The Big Vitamin D Mistake [pdf] (2017)
#53It’s crazy how many of these comments completely ignored TFA. Hackernews is in decline and will be indistinguishable from Facebook or Reddit before long.
On published article does not mean it's proved and everyone must follow watever it says. The Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin_D says > However, the evidence for the health benefits of vitamin D supplementation in individuals who are already vitamin D sufficient is unproven. andvitamin D is liposoluble so overdose is a risk. So I strongly recomend to ask a real medical doctor.
Re: The Big Vitamin D Mistake [pdf] (2017)
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
On published article does not mean it's proved and everyone must follow watever it says. The Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin_D says > However, the evidence for the health benefits of vitamin D supplementation in individuals who are already vitamin D sufficient is unproven. andvitamin D is liposoluble so overdose is a risk. So I strongly recomend to ask a real medical doctor.
duh? why aren’t you discussing the merits or demerits of the article directly?
Re: The Big Vitamin D Mistake [pdf] (2017)
#55Re: The Big Vitamin D Mistake [pdf] (2017)
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can get 10,000 or even 100,000 IU tablets prescribed in Canada
Yeah but to get a prescription you probably have to have a valid reason. If the general directive is that 1000 is fine, I'm assuming it's not easy to get a prescription for that
Re: The Big Vitamin D Mistake [pdf] (2017)
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
yes, but not long term, from what i’ve read. do it for 90 days through winter maybe?
What have you read?